I'm starting to think the 3500k range is the better K to have... my tent with just the cobs has one side 3000k and the other 3500k and that side with 3500k always performs that little bit better. Buds seem slightly bigger that side, there is just a little bit more oomph from the plants on that side.
What i think I might do for the next buils is QB@s at 3000k with a mix of COB's at 3500K with the odd 4000K
Its the blue, @Slater!
I've noticed on my current grow. Although I intentionally harvested a few plants early, I can't help but notice I got much larger buds with the 3000K QB vs my 3500K cobs. I blasted blurples as side light for both grows so thats a fixed variable for me. Although buds are clearly larger, they are also more airy and more susceptible to foxtailing. When I noticed this, I turned up the 4000K board and lessened the blurple exposure for the next plant in line for chopping.
This next plant now has much more dense bud and frost is intense.
Seems there is such a thing as too much red. Seems to be a trade off between flower matter and density of buds. OR just need a more all inclusive spectrum to get best of both worlds.
Regardless, the 4000K spectrum is a keeper for SURE! Not just good for veg like I originally thought. If you look at spectrum chart, 4000K has lotsa red too. Its just that the higher spike in blue makes us see it cooler. You actually get more light in total. The spike in blue means its a great tool to have when you wanna add some blue during flower but not at the expense of losing too much red.
Although combining 3000K and 4000K might seem like its better to just use 3500K. But unlike using straight 3500K like I did last grow, combining both 3k and 4k allows for a ton of red/blue combo. I.e 100% 3000K + 50% 4000K etc.
So much new stuff to play with......
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk