Indoor Winter Autos By MOG

[CannaRuss]

I have really tortured these poor girls by running the nutrients at the extreme edges of what they might like. It is the only way I have to get an estimate of what they might like and not like.

I wish I had access to a lab for a real tissue analysis but I cannot afford that. It would make this process a lot more accurate.

Lookin’ good non the less. Very few sharing as much detailed info of there hard work, patrticularly about MC. Appreciate your willingness bro!

 

[Mañ'O'Green]

Lookin’ good non the less. Very few sharing as much detailed info of there hard work, patrticularly about MC. Appreciate your willingness bro!

I am determined to get a practical schedule for autos that makes sense for a wide range of strains and phenotype.

The plants seem to be responding well to the 9-7-15. ~500 PPM.

 

[Steppa]

Hey yo @Mañ'O'Green jus a quickie, which you may have answered elsewhere (sorry!).. I see you stating PPM's whereas others go with EC!.. can I ask your reasoning to go with PPM's when most use and would say EC is the standard?.. I've jus invested in a lovely meter which gives all 3 readings -ppm, 0.5,0.7! I should've done years ago really but had to now I've found autos to be so much less forgiving, unfortunately... oh and do you adjust PPM's accordingly to each plant?.. Thanks in advance, I'll be tagging along from now onwards, great informative reading BTW, cheers bud...
Easy now!..

 

[low_and_slow]

I am determined to get a practical schedule for autos that makes sense for a wide range of strains and phenotype.

The plants seem to be responding well to the 9-7-15. ~500 PPM.

Hey @Mañ'O'Green I've got a quick question about NPK math; specifically, can you check my work here?

I'm using the Flora Trio by GH. The Grow is 2-1-6, the Micro is 5-0-1, and the Bloom is 0-5-4.

If I do 3 parts Grow, 2 parts Micro, and 2 parts Bloom, am I right to multiply those units by the NPK numbers for each component an then add them up?

3 (2-1-6) = 6-3-18
2 (5-0-1) = 10-0-2
2 (0-5-4) = 0-10-8

So would this ratio end up being 16-13-28? Then you reduce to a 'common denominator' to 8-6.5-14? I'm trying to figure out how to get close to your 9-7-15 to see if it works on my end with my plants...

 

[Mañ'O'Green]

Hey yo @Mañ'O'Green jus a quickie, which you may have answered elsewhere (sorry!).. I see you stating PPM's whereas others go with EC!.. can I ask your reasoning to go with PPM's when most use and would say EC is the standard?.. I've jus invested in a lovely meter which gives all 3 readings -ppm, 0.5,0.7! I should've done years ago really but had to now I've found autos to be so much less forgiving, unfortunately... oh and do you adjust PPM's accordingly to each plant?.. Thanks in advance, I'll be tagging along from now onwards, great informative reading BTW, cheers bud...
Easy now!..

In the USA the Hanna scale (500 PPM) is standard in the rest of the world it is EC.

 

[Mañ'O'Green]

Hey @Mañ'O'Green I've got a quick question about NPK math; specifically, can you check my work here?

I'm using the Flora Trio by GH. The Grow is 2-1-6, the Micro is 5-0-1, and the Bloom is 0-5-4.

If I do 3 parts Grow, 2 parts Micro, and 2 parts Bloom, am I right to multiply those units by the NPK numbers for each component an then add them up?

3 (2-1-6) = 6-3-18
2 (5-0-1) = 10-0-2
2 (0-5-4) = 0-10-8

So would this ratio end up being 16-13-28? Then you reduce to a 'common denominator' to 8-6.5-14? I'm trying to figure out how to get close to your 9-7-15 to see if it works on my end with my plants...

No that is not how the math would work. The ratio of NPK remains the same in a solution only the PPM would change so three parts of grow would still be 2-1-6. The PPM would be 3 times a single dose. I am not sure you can get the ratio by simple math but if you could it would be with an average

so the NPK ratio would be 5-3-9

I think!

Edit: Wrong too stoned should be least common denominator

 

[low_and_slow]

Hmm, so if you add one part each of the three part solution, what do you get?

I.e. (2-1-6) + (5-0-1) + (0-5-4) = ???

4-2-12 is 2-1-6, just without a conversion to the lowest common denominator, no?

So maybe my question is, does 6-3-18 plus 10-0-2 plus 0-10-8 add up to 16-13-28? And then you divide by a common denominator to reduce to 8-6.5-14?

 

[Mañ'O'Green]

Hmm, so if you add one part each of the three part solution, what do you get?

I.e. (2-1-6) + (5-0-1) + (0-5-4) = ???

4-2-12 is 2-1-6, just without a conversion to the lowest common denominator, no?

No add the N to the N. 2 and 5 and 0 = 7 / 3 = 2.3 then add the P 1 and 0 and 5 = 6/3 = 2 then add the K 6 and 1 and 4 = 11/3= 3.66

So it would be N 2.3 - P 2 - K 3.66 Wrong................. still.

 

[low_and_slow]

No add the N to the N. 2 and 5 and 0 = 7 / 3 = 2.3 then add the P 1 and 0 and 5 = 6/3 = 2 then add the K 6 and 1 and 4 = 11/3= 3.66

So it would be N 2.3 - P 2 - K 3.66

Okay so we're actually saying the same thing, so you add the Ns, Ps, and Ks, but if you have 3ml/gallon of the grow, 2ml/gallon of the micro, and 2ml/gallon of Bloom, that gets to 8-6.5-14?

 

[Mañ'O'Green]

Okay so we're actually saying the same thing, so you add the Ns, Ps, and Ks, but if you have 3ml/gallon of the grow, 2ml/gallon of the micro, and 2ml/gallon of Bloom, that gets to 8-6.5-14?

Still wrong!