HashMaster
In Dog Beers I've Only Had One
Hmm what's up @HashMaster @Moondude @Dr. Babnik I have mixed feelings about pre harvest flushing and have tried a few different ways.First off if you think/believe that an ash that does not burn gray is caused by improper flush or nutes still present( like we've all been told) then it of course makes sense that you should flush your plants before harvest( but look at your curing process before you spend money on a flush agent) if you think that a plant should use all its nute reserves and turn yellow from nitrogen deficiency before /as the triches are ambering up,think again,what would happen if you defoliated maybe a few weeks before harvest and there was no nute reserves or fans to turn yellow,changes the whole game doesn't it?? There are many theories and "tests" done to "prove" that flushing is necessary most of which were probably done by nute companies to have you buy their product..in a natural setting where the fans would be necessary to store what little nutes it can gather from a( prolly) unconditioned soil, the fans would be necessary for the plant to make it to harvest therefore the yellowing is caused by the plants usage of those reserves,but ,there would not be a flush of a plant in a natural setting,..I have ran plants with no flush and they burn clean I have straight water flushed for a few weeks and they have still burned clean..the mid term flush between cycles is to flush salt buildup which may not happen if the plant is watered with plenty of runoff and done often,but when a plant is being flushed from a nute issue or trying to "reset" the medium it is said to be done with ( something) like 3-5 times the water as the pot size( cause this clears nute/salt buildup and basically resets the medium which is why a 1/4 strength feed is supposed to follow) ..these are my thoughts mixed with different reports/studies and without an in depth and accurate test of two plant( one flushed and one not) (to see what's left in it) how would you know if the product your spending money on really works,but each strain is different and each pheno could also be different in the way they use the nutes,now if your plant has an issue that is obviously cause by a problem( like nute burn,spotting,toxicity,deficiency) then I would say flush it( and this would include near harvest cause that's when plants needs change and a lot of the time are over/under nuted) but if your plant gets to the Amber % you are looking for but the leaves show an even uniform fading ( or none at all)I would not flush( and I have had them finish this way) sorry for the book but do a search for flushing and you will get 50% say yes and 50% that say no,,try it and see..just my 2cents tho..
Very true.....
There are some who flush and some who don't. There are some that can taste the stored nutes and some that can't (I myself can)
But as I was just mentioning to another grower, anymore I really could care less about all of the other reasons for it except for the contaminates / health aspect.
Flushing can be a personal preference, but I even flush organic grows due to the potential contamination.
A hazard of getting old I guess, anymore if there isn't a lab analysis proving no contaminates present then I prefer to err on the side of caution and assume they are present.
Actually this could be an interesting flushing sub topic for the Dr. to jump in on with his history in chemicals.
The chelated flush is supposed to grab onto a lot of unwanted things that are more prevalent in most everything around us anymore.
Maybe he can shed some light on that angle of it.