In no way am I saying that anything I posted was the entire truth, lol. Its just an opinion, like everyone elses, lol. No one is saying it can't be done in a tent. What Im saying has nothing to do with setup/equipment, but more about time and available space. Growing out 4 plants at a time in a tent and making selections to improve the line, will take forever. You won't be ready to sell seeds for years.. Unless it's done half ass. But it is still doable if you have the years to spare. That was my little point on these new breeders that have only been around for 2 yrs or less. Breeding takes years.. Making seeds takes 4-6 weeks. There is a major difference between the two. These new companies are popping up with multiple strains for sale, claiming the autos are at like f4, but the company has only been breeding since 2018 or something, lol. There is a reason that mandelbrots royal kush lines go for 80-150 a seed. Because he spent countless years of his life breeding and stabilizing it to f11. Real breeding and real selection matters, and matters to some people. But again, it also doesn't matter to a lot of people.. To each their own.Whatever, it's just not the whole truth. It is one way of breeding but there are other ways too. It's very possible to make a cross in a tent if you have the genetics. It's in the F2 the selection is crucial. I can do that by breeding little by little in a tent or a bunch of F2 outdoor or have access to a collective. It's very possible to sell the F2 to a customer that want to do that selection. What I am trying to say is that it is impossible to make the selection if you don't have the right climate, right test subject for medical or breed for the wrong goal. It's just to see where the famous medical strains come from, it's not from the usual subjects and this will continue to happen in a larger scale the more skilled growers can work legally. So the future will tell and it will show that the selector and the lab rat are the stars and not the breeder with the best setup. Big pharma and big agriculture would win the skill/setup contest 99 out of 100 times so we may all be growing monsanto soon, I don't think so.
All of us will probably never agree on the ins and outs of breeding and it's definition, lol. I think the purpose of this convo is more about setting up guidelines for the influx of auto "breeders" that are trying to come on site and sell their wares. Some are legit, and some aren't. Some are ready, some aren't. The real question is, how do YOU as a member want them vetted? Do you want them vetted at all? We've seen both sides at AFN.. Anyone remember Stitch and those "super autos"? Or when Heavyweight came on the scene with all those auto strains? I think they were on site for a while and just about everyone who had their seeds, had issues. It's situations like that that we want to prevent a head of time. We can all agree to disagree about terminology and personal preferences of breeding. But when you see a new auto breeder pop up in the breeder section, Im sure most are assuming that these companies are up to par or that AFN at least did some research on them... But the AFN breeder expectation checklist might not match your breeder expectation checklist. I think Hobbs is trying to make those two lists match up more than they do now.
Last edited: