We could surmise that four of these leds equalling 280 watts would easily compare with 600 watts of hps and possibly out yield it.
This has me very intrigued in leds. The only drawback for these fixtures is the price.
I'm not trying to hijack, but if everyone bears with me after a few dabs, I like to do some math to justify me(anyone else) that uses hps , getting a rad setup like aforementioned...I may have an extra 4x4 tent just lying around in need of leds... who knows...any who...
Several dabs later....
Now if my calculations are not correct remember I'm technically intoxicated here, nature of the beast....
The power savings using 280w of leds compared to a 600w (630w) hps is equal to .35kw/hr. Or 350 watts per hour if you will.
My locality charges around $0.15 kw/hr. At .35kw/hr savings that equals $1.26/day & $459.90 per year of power saved.
These fixtures are about $1000 USD correct?
Now remember my scenario had four of them. Why not... We're not all led masters the first go, I'd like success if I'm going for it.
That power savings works out to 8.7 years later I will break even on the initial investment on the fixtures. (4.35 years if I was tang )
That seems like a long time just to break even....
Keep in mind this isn't bashing leds at all, it's pretty amazing that 280w or less can compete with 600w.
You have my attention. Now so do leds...
All that aside if I can turn a 350g/m2 strain into a 450g/m2 strain from switching to leds , I would get the return on investment a lot sooner than in the 8 odd years of just power savings.
At that point I'm really sold.
To me the idea of Just dropping four to five large on a possibility is pretty hard to do.
Again I applaud your team and everyone else hear at afn blazing new grounds with each day.
Edit.
I think my math may have been off somewhere I have a feeling...