i defoliated for 20+ years because we believed what you and others believe , i couldnt believe the improvement i seen when i stopped due to someone telling me 10-15 years ago it was not the right thing to be doing , and no i dont have pics for you as we werent into the habbit of taking pics of our crops to show them off 30-35 years ago , hell hardly anyone had a camera back then
imho and from my experiences i truely believe that anyone benifitting from defoliation hasnt got thier environment set up properly , take for example a buddy of mine , he has a single 1000 hps in a room the same size as i have 3 400's , when i go in my room i have a hard time finding a shadow anywhere , light is blasting all around , bouncing from one wall to another and from the floor to the ceiling , i dont get shaded bud the way he does , his few plants directly under his 1000 look great , the rest ,,,,,,,, not so great , i also tripple the yeild he does and he is growing the same clones/plants as me (always my clones/seeds)
anyway , just my experiences with defoliation and 30+ years growing
peace
i understand the camera thing took me a lonnnnnnnnng time to post pics again after an incident w/ me a santa suite and a large sativa decorated for x-mas years ago.... but while i was an admin on another forum w/ muddy he coinvinced me it was better than it used to be
i went from a member to an admin w/o showing one single pic of a plant so i must have an idea of what i speak from time to time
and honestly i run into this often when discussing experiences i have had many years ago people want right there proof as scientific
and i understand experiences will vary due to the skillset of the grower from time to time
I'm not going to get into a pissing contest about age it is pointless as far as credentials go mine are more than capeable of growing a weed??I promise
i used rockwool when it was only in wall insulating i've even tried rolls of carpet and tons of other mediums
look i'm not trying to create an issue just put an end to the blanket myth people have "heard" from somebody
As far as the example of your friend are you telling me that you have 1200 watts to his 1000 watt and it is coming from multiple directions
so you have a higher overall wattage , multiple point of lights angles and you can put them lower due to the heat issues
well of course you would get better overall light and after thirty years i would hope you would yield far better than the other setup
this goes back to specific example
400's are more effecient just more expensive to buy three lights instead of one now this is totally off topic but in my thread so ok
if you didn't yield more of course there would be something wrong
Maybe if i make this easier to visualize it would be easier to understand we are not talking equipment we are talking simply theese techniques
if you go to the beach you hold an umbrella your friend does not you would get a more severe reaction to the more intense sun
if you block your head w/ the umbrella but your feet are exposed to the sun well...don't they get burnt and not your head???
was that because the sun is more intense no one part of you is shadded from the light wre talking about to grow
i also said this wasn't the same across the board like compairing your system to your friends like they are the same???
I would think a man of your experience would atleast compair apples to apples by now if you truely wanted "tested" results
well the PROOF is in the pics so far the natural plant is far behind in size
and from my somewhat limited knowledge of plants i believe generally a larger plant has the better ability to yield more
aside of internode stretch making it appear the plant is larger
like i said before the plant offers the fans up as the first sacrifice to preditors and continues to grow in nature fine and we are not discussing nature here we are talking about artificial nature which is being manufactured by us
and depending on the strain it can be quite difficult getting through the leaf canopy to lower /medium branch sites
i believe this is where alll the confusion really arises from to begin w/
it is considered common practice to cut the lower branches off because they are less productive and popcorny
well if they are then you don't have your situation dialed in appropriately
but i think you may see why i am running this as a post it is hard to find correct doccumented evidence
sorry this is gonna sound rude and it isn't intended to it is to mearly point out the fact that things can get confusing w/ all the things in a growroom
but it is hard to take specifics as advise contradicting pictured multiple results as not the way it is and then in two scentences one spans the gap of 10-15 years being the same as 30-35 years so i don't know how reliable any of the opinions expressed are valid as pictured information
At this point i am confused you continue to not mention things from my post like you haven't read the info and just posted your opinion???
Opinions are great and everyone has one but i am trying to keep this to what actually happens w/ the plant not speculating on what should occur