He does. And i have no proof that what i say is right. But im.looking for facts here. I replied to a guy saying flushing is a myth.. well give me proof. Is the first study done in soil?
The first source University of Guelph, which I know nothing about.
The 2nd guy's main point is that there is no plant mechanism that can remove chemicals from buds.
I'd like to see a scientific justification for flushing.
In science you are guilty (wrong) until you prove yourself innocent (correct).
I've never seen scientific studies, not counting placebo-influenced opinions, that prove flushing works.
Scientifically speaking, it's up to flushers to prove flushing is useful.
It's not up to anti-flushers to prove it doesn't work.
I can't prove that turquoise swans don't exist, because it's almost impossible to prove a negative.
If someone claims they do exist, it's up to them to prove it.
The other popular smoked plant tobacco isn't flushed.
They go by real science, not stoner science.