I'm a huge fan in efficiency. It's one if the main factors in lighting besides spectrum.
So from my reading and reading I came across credible documentation stating kind led were 22.5% efficient. Now that's 22.5 X wall wattage which equals the par watts which is the key number. The remaining percentage is heat. Hps varies anywhere from 20-40% efficient putting most of them as a better choice over kind LEDs. Crazy right? People say led is cooler, well watt for watt its not unless it's more efficient. Now I have read tons on Mars and they have the same diodes if I'm not mistaken. Which would put them in the same class as kind. Or according to price a lot lower.
I'm not trying to cut anyone up but I'm really trying to figure why most led companies say they are equal to higher wattage lights when the math states otherwise.
An argument I have come across is well my plants are monsters under them. Well that's great but what if your room was 5 degrees cooler or your plants had 20% more light? Sure it could be better.
So from my reading and reading I came across credible documentation stating kind led were 22.5% efficient. Now that's 22.5 X wall wattage which equals the par watts which is the key number. The remaining percentage is heat. Hps varies anywhere from 20-40% efficient putting most of them as a better choice over kind LEDs. Crazy right? People say led is cooler, well watt for watt its not unless it's more efficient. Now I have read tons on Mars and they have the same diodes if I'm not mistaken. Which would put them in the same class as kind. Or according to price a lot lower.
I'm not trying to cut anyone up but I'm really trying to figure why most led companies say they are equal to higher wattage lights when the math states otherwise.
An argument I have come across is well my plants are monsters under them. Well that's great but what if your room was 5 degrees cooler or your plants had 20% more light? Sure it could be better.