We have to be carefull in saying coco in brick form is no good.
I use Cannacoco brand for a reason.
Its $20 Canadian, needs no buffering and is garbage free.
So you get what you pay for.
@arty zan did a lot of cut and paste from the coco for cannabis website, which recommends buffering at a rate of 7ml per gallon of water (done twice).
This wasteful and unnecessary.
Once is plenty.
The problem with this advice is the use of GH calmag which will cause terrible nute lock out because of the excessive amount of calcium.
People are paranoid about calcium def'c.
Most people over do it with the calcium , causing issues with the nutes and then wonder why the plant stopped hrowing.
There is a much better chance of having ph related issues in coco, than calcium.
Be preoccupied by the ph more than calcium.
All nutes contain enough calcium to give you plenty of warning of a calcium def'c.
My apologies I meant ad the word "Cheap" in reference to coco bricks. I however thoroughly advised to use reputable companies, did I not?
I encouraged the use of companies which supply the facts, that their coco is aged , buffered and washed, which is heavily stressed thought my post, is it not?
I use compressed coco, but it comes in small pucks rather than the brick form but it is from a reputable company, it is washed , aged and buffered and i love it!
Using advice from the internet which has my own personal advice dispersed through is not a crime and i stand by what I say, I am happy to cut and paste from articles I have read and used in the past, there is no problem with that!
Call me out if you like but I stand by what I posted and I won't be intimidated!
I also use my own experience through out as well but because I take time to reply as fully as I can, I don't necessarily have time to write an essay from scratch each and every time.
I research tirelessly, something for which i am known for in the forum and something which most people can't be bothered to do!
There are plenty of staff that will back me up on this, as this isn't my first rodeo!
Please don't think that i am stepping on your toes because that is not my intention.
I am no Jonny come lately & have been growing for long enough to know my onions.
I am am an ex member of The High Team, Auto Warriors, Global Mod & Sub Admin, here at AFN as well as modding other forums.
I have plenty of experience and am a well known member here, something which my reaction score shows.
Furthermore, I mentioned in my post "not all Cal/Mags are created equal" ,did I not?
I advised on doing research and reading journals and asking other growers, what they used if you saw them getting good results, did i not?
If you are looking for absolutes , there aren't any, we all grow in different ways and use different products and so we use best fit analogies and recommend doing as much of your own research as you can.
I don't wish to get in a tit for tat with anyone about this or that, in fact I point blank refuse to!
All I can do is give the best advice I can and so far I haven't had any complaints, so I must be doing something right!
Cal def can and does occur in coco, I am not paranoid of Calcium def but to not be aware of the fact that the break down of coco especially in the early part of the grow, which releases potassium which then does lock up calcium and that amendments then need to be used when it occurs, in order to avoid deficiencies.
Prevention is better than cure but all the while being judicious with the quantities used, go to far and then you end up in cure territory.
I think I gave good advice on PHing coco and PHing in different phases of growth, did I not?
At no point did I mention GH Cal/Mag!
That all i have to say on the matter and I hope we can rub along nicely without calling the other out and creating a stir.
I hope we are of an understanding on this, AFN is about being helpful and being friendly to all members and that is how I also wish to proceed.
All the best to you and have yourself a great day
Arty