Live Stoners Live Stoner Chat - Oct-Dec '23

Status
Not open for further replies.
excuze me, but -> wtf duz "go out to eat" even mean-?? :paleo: ppp
I forget your single and never had the pleasure of having to do what you dont want to do 50% of the time. And I use the number 50% very loosely.
We're going to a restaurant. Cause I guess my personal cook is on strike tonight.
 
I forget your single and never had the pleasure of having to do what you dont want to do 50% of the time. And I use the number 50% very loosely.
We're going to a restaurant. Cause I guess my personal cook is on strike tonight.

u.......poor.......sod :nonono:
















:crying::pighug: ppp
 
EXACTLY! that's why I said "I'll reconsider"

And yes, india was just a simulation and that's precisely my point. If that's all we are given to go off of, how are we ever supposed to believe it? Just cause they say so and put a lil simulation out.

I mean think of the best space movie you can think of, that's just a movie budget. Imagine the kind of crap they could pull over on us with that nasa budget. :rofl:

So to give us nothing but simulations and obvious CGI, it's very hard to believe.
Obviously they could come drop a moon rock at your house and u would just tell them until u could scientifically test it yourself its also fake! I don’t trust india regardless but you can’t show a 3rd party view of the lander landing! U would need 2 landers to do that 1 solely to film the first one so a simulation of how it supposedly landed is best they can do!

U seem like u are def in the age bracket of “gets all their news online” and thats a dangerous place to absorb knowledge! U need go get your ass to a library with actual books! Any jackass these days can make a website! I could start a website saying u were a talking donkey and people would for sure believe it but that don’t make it true!

Either that or u need to lay off on the dabs! :shrug::haha::crying: :pighug:
 
EXACTLY! that's why I said "I'll reconsider"

And yes, india was just a simulation and that's precisely my point. If that's all we are given to go off of, how are we ever supposed to believe it? Just cause they say so and put a lil simulation out.

I mean think of the best space movie you can think of, that's just a movie budget. Imagine the kind of crap they could pull over on us with that nasa budget. :rofl:

So to give us nothing but simulations and obvious CGI, it's very hard to believe.
There was no CGI when the moon landing happened the first time bro! Nowadays they could easily fake on a computer if its just pics! I could prob photoshop a pic of Gracie on the moon if i wanted go bust out the laptop! :rofl:
 
no, we're in the era of disinformation....get it right man!:deadhorse: ppp
Of course. But if you have discernment, then you can pick the good from the bad. By Era of information I mean that we have access to things much quicker than you old folks in your time. Not saying everything out there is correct.
 
A rat runs across rocket on space x stream. Either a big movie production set, or rats can hang on for dear life. :crying:


That does not look like rats:nono: Also first thing I notice is the lack of subscribers and likes for the videos your sharing that one at whooping 234:haha: So how much reputation can be given to those sources:toke::doh::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
I mean, just cause you saw it on TV doesn't mean that it actually happened.. the race to space was real no doubt.. but the fact they had the technology to go to the moon then and make a phone call to the president and air live on TV, then just a few years ago claimed to lose that same technology doesn't make any sense.




U trust this face??? :yoinks::crying:

1696454190582.png


More like an AI generated video of Buzz! Can’t trust nothing these days why i only trust old established knowledge in paper books!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top