Old Reviews Sea Grow (4-26-26) by Grow More -- All in One Solution for Autos.

[Torched]

http://sunlightsupply.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/product/721620_MSDS.pdf
Here is the MSDS you can find most of them at that site. I think there is some confusion here between;
Humboldt's Own Avalanche -which are nasty poison and
Mendocino Avalanche by Grow More - I know nothing about it except what the MSDS says above. Super acidic.

 

[A4]

Humboldt's Own isn't avalance, it was called Gravity. It has already been banned everywhere and they have received massive fines for not labeling their products.

Mendicino Avalanche is produced by GrowMore. It has been banned Oregon at the moment and while they don't list paclobutrazol as an ingredient I am highly suspicious as to why it has been banned in Oregon.

 

[sniper]

damn a420er your a info bloodhound :clap:

is there those data sheets for seagrow 16-16-16 seagrow 4-26-26 and Hawaiian bud?



edit.... i cant see either after i download to my phone just red X's in boxes

 

[A4]

Hey sniper, that attachment is a pdf. You will need a pdf viewer for it. No, that is only for avalanche. That is the only one I suspect at the moment. I can check on the others If you are concerned about them. Give me a few hours as I am on my phone as well and hate using it for this.

 

[Torched]

You are totally right a420er, I must have been thinking of Snow storm by humboldt own.

Just because something is not available in Oregon doesn't necessarily mean anything. Oregon has some crazy laws and can take a long time to get the labels "approved"; it is the most stringent state with it's labeling laws. They actually enforce those laws where most states do not.

 

[A4]

True enough, the only reason I make the coorelation is because Oregon has been at the forefront with blocking the plant hormones.

 

[Torched]

Here's a MSDS sheet and heavy metal report for the 16-16-16. I couldn't get one for the bloom.

View attachment Heavy Metal Report Seagrow 16-16-16.pdf
View attachment Sea Grow (All Purpose).pdf

 

[sniper]

thanks torch the first link did the same but the 2nd worked :thumbs:

a420er i was just curious :
if the "this product contains a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer " on the label of the 4-26-26 didn't scare me off it 2yrs ago doubt anything will

i don't live in cali anyways so i can just ignore that right?

 

[Bromeo]

thanks torch the first link did the same but the 2nd worked :thumbs:

a420er i was just curious :
if the "this product contains a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer " on the label of the 4-26-26 didn't scare me off it 2yrs ago doubt anything will

i don't live in cali anyways so i can just ignore that right?

Perhaps I'm showing my age here Sniper but that same warning label used to actually read "product may contain chemicals that have been known to cause cancer in rats in California". That warning label used to be on everything from makeup products to food coloring. Caused quite a scare in the late 80s early 90s. I'm with you I don't know how serious I take it. But I remember that label being on just about everything at the commissary on the army base back then and that was the only place we could shop. We were like "well good thing we ain't Cali rats".

 

[sniper]

"product may contain chemicals that have been known to cause cancer in rats in California"

they must have shortened it romeo cause i don't think i ever seen that paragraph on anything :