How much Remo does your WCOG tolerate? I can see some yellow tips.
I am testing @BiG Plant Science nutes compared to Advanced. My FB WCOGs are satisfied with 1.5 ml/l while FB Creen Crack eats 5 ml/l without a single yellow tip. I even did a mistake, while mixing 2 and 1 l water, feeding a plant 10 ml/l in stead of 5. She did not react with visible symptoms.

Another question - what are the N sources in Remo?

Hi Dr. Babnick,

The nitrogen sources are a combination of (not in this order) potassium nitrate, magnesium nitrate, and calcium nitrate. There is also a small amount of nitrogen from the seaweed extract as well.
 
Hi Dr. Babnick,

The nitrogen sources are a combination of (not in this order) potassium nitrate, magnesium nitrate, and calcium nitrate. There is also a small amount of nitrogen from the seaweed extract as well.
Great combination!
I prefer the nutes to be free from ammonium salts.
Very interesting line you have there. Any plans for distribution in Denmark?
I can order from the UK, but the shipping cost makes it too expensive.
 
Just to be difficult...what is the arguements for one nute line over the other? ;)

Just to respond to your last couple of posts, we don't like to do comparative graphs. The honest truth is nutrients aren't everything. You have 4 variables that lead to top grade results:

1. Nutrients
2. Grower Experience
3. Grow Room Setup
4. Genetics

There is some spillover with the nutrients and grower experience in that if your feed program is effective, in theory, it reduces the amount of problem solving needed, which would be a trait that an experienced grower would excel in. There is a lot of controversy over who's "best" and frankly "best" is all relative. If your plants are healthy and you're getting the results you expect, then that's all that counts.

As for our line over competitors, we designed our line to cater to large scale producers and as a fringe benefit, small scale home producers. Previously, manufacturers were selling nutrients to black market growers. This means the value of cannabis is high and growers have the extra cash to spend on expensive nutrient lines. In response to this, manufacturers would separate key ingredients into separate jugs, forcing the consumer to buy more products. There are some lines on the market that recommend 15 different jugs to get all of the ingredients you need and this is just unreasonable. The redundancy of these lines is ridiculous and comes at the expense of the consumer.

Now that cannabis is becoming more and more legal, under the basic principles of supply and demand, if more cannabis is being grown, then the value of the product will decrease. If the value of cannabis decreases, then consumers don't have as much money to buy expensive nutrients, and certainly if they're running gardens measured in acres.

We created a line that consolidated all of these redundant products into the least amount of jugs possible so that you can get everything you need for a lower cost. This is much more appealing in the new cannabis market. It's an opportunity for us in that our competitors have based their businesses around selling over priced lines, and if they want to stay competitive, they will need to either price reduce or outsource their production (which leads to inconsistencies in quality).

Now that being said, it means the nutrient game is not as lucrative as it used to be, but branding has now become more lucrative. If we can produce a top quality nutrient for the cost that consumers are looking for, then it reflects on our brand and we can use this to transition into other markets by bringing an element of accountability to the new cannabis market. Not to sound cheesy, but you're not just buying nutrients, you're also buying a concept...and that's why I'd invite you to try our products.

Hope that helps,

Joel
 
Just to respond to your last couple of posts, we don't like to do comparative graphs. The honest truth is nutrients aren't everything. You have 4 variables that lead to top grade results:

1. Nutrients
2. Grower Experience
3. Grow Room Setup
4. Genetics

There is some spillover with the nutrients and grower experience in that if your feed program is effective, in theory, it reduces the amount of problem solving needed, which would be a trait that an experienced grower would excel in. There is a lot of controversy over who's "best" and frankly "best" is all relative. If your plants are healthy and you're getting the results you expect, then that's all that counts.

As for our line over competitors, we designed our line to cater to large scale producers and as a fringe benefit, small scale home producers. Previously, manufacturers were selling nutrients to black market growers. This means the value of cannabis is high and growers have the extra cash to spend on expensive nutrient lines. In response to this, manufacturers would separate key ingredients into separate jugs, forcing the consumer to buy more products. There are some lines on the market that recommend 15 different jugs to get all of the ingredients you need and this is just unreasonable. The redundancy of these lines is ridiculous and comes at the expense of the consumer.

Now that cannabis is becoming more and more legal, under the basic principles of supply and demand, if more cannabis is being grown, then the value of the product will decrease. If the value of cannabis decreases, then consumers don't have as much money to buy expensive nutrients, and certainly if they're running gardens measured in acres.

We created a line that consolidated all of these redundant products into the least amount of jugs possible so that you can get everything you need for a lower cost. This is much more appealing in the new cannabis market. It's an opportunity for us in that our competitors have based their businesses around selling over priced lines, and if they want to stay competitive, they will need to either price reduce or outsource their production (which leads to inconsistencies in quality).

Now that being said, it means the nutrient game is not as lucrative as it used to be, but branding has now become more lucrative. If we can produce a top quality nutrient for the cost that consumers are looking for, then it reflects on our brand and we can use this to transition into other markets by bringing an element of accountability to the new cannabis market. Not to sound cheesy, but you're not just buying nutrients, you're also buying a concept...and that's why I'd invite you to try our products.

Hope that helps,

Joel
Ofcouse I see your point!
Just me who like to analyse and measure everything I do. An old environmental damage.
 
@RemoNutrients if possible could you explain the ph balance I'm loving the line so far but wanting to try with coco would I need to adjust ph accordingly or will it balance itself no matter if it's coco or soil??

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320A using Tapatalk
 
You want to do a feed, feed, water because it keeps you PPM's stable throughout the week, and then by watering at the end, it's almost like you're cleansing the pallet for the next feed. If you alternate with a feed, water, feed, water, you're raising the PPM with every feed, and then crashing the PPM with every water so your weekly PPMs wouldn't be consistent at any point in the week. You want to have consistent feed schedules rather than a spike, crash, spike, crash.

As mentioned before, the water at the end serves to give your plants a little break from being pushed into enhanced growth, reduces salt buildup, and saves you a little cash on nutrients :)

Hope that helps,

Joel

That helps tremendously and makes complete sense... I am starting 3 x Auto Glueberry (Dutch Passion) tonight so I'm going to do this from day 1. THANK YOU!!
Fantastic information!

Just to respond to your last couple of posts, we don't like to do comparative graphs. The honest truth is nutrients aren't everything. You have 4 variables that lead to top grade results:

1. Nutrients
2. Grower Experience
3. Grow Room Setup
4. Genetics

There is some spillover with the nutrients and grower experience in that if your feed program is effective, in theory, it reduces the amount of problem solving needed, which would be a trait that an experienced grower would excel in. There is a lot of controversy over who's "best" and frankly "best" is all relative. If your plants are healthy and you're getting the results you expect, then that's all that counts.

As for our line over competitors, we designed our line to cater to large scale producers and as a fringe benefit, small scale home producers. Previously, manufacturers were selling nutrients to black market growers. This means the value of cannabis is high and growers have the extra cash to spend on expensive nutrient lines. In response to this, manufacturers would separate key ingredients into separate jugs, forcing the consumer to buy more products. There are some lines on the market that recommend 15 different jugs to get all of the ingredients you need and this is just unreasonable. The redundancy of these lines is ridiculous and comes at the expense of the consumer.

Now that cannabis is becoming more and more legal, under the basic principles of supply and demand, if more cannabis is being grown, then the value of the product will decrease. If the value of cannabis decreases, then consumers don't have as much money to buy expensive nutrients, and certainly if they're running gardens measured in acres.

We created a line that consolidated all of these redundant products into the least amount of jugs possible so that you can get everything you need for a lower cost. This is much more appealing in the new cannabis market. It's an opportunity for us in that our competitors have based their businesses around selling over priced lines, and if they want to stay competitive, they will need to either price reduce or outsource their production (which leads to inconsistencies in quality).

Now that being said, it means the nutrient game is not as lucrative as it used to be, but branding has now become more lucrative. If we can produce a top quality nutrient for the cost that consumers are looking for, then it reflects on our brand and we can use this to transition into other markets by bringing an element of accountability to the new cannabis market. Not to sound cheesy, but you're not just buying nutrients, you're also buying a concept...and that's why I'd invite you to try our products.

Hope that helps,

Joel

I love your concepts and bottom line. Definitely something I'd be proud to be apart of and give my money to. I definitely appreciate that as a small grower who strives to be self sustainable for my wife and I's personal needs. :clapper: So far everything is tops in my book about [HASHTAG]#remonutrients[/HASHTAG] !!

WP_20161114_001.jpg


The official test grow starts tonight!!
 
That helps tremendously and makes complete sense... I am starting 3 x Auto Glueberry (Dutch Passion) tonight so I'm going to do this from day 1. THANK YOU!!
Fantastic information!



I love your concepts and bottom line. Definitely something I'd be proud to be apart of and give my money to. I definitely appreciate that as a small grower who strives to be self sustainable for my wife and I's personal needs. :clapper: So far everything is tops in my book about [HASHTAG]#remonutrients[/HASHTAG] !!

View attachment 658841

The official test grow starts tonight!!
@Rebel subbed up got me front row seats [emoji1] [emoji1] [emoji1] good luck man I'm using remos too I'm loving it sooooo far super simple

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320A using Tapatalk
 
If this is a good as it gets AS @Rebel and @IzzyTheGrower says which I believe them wholeheartedly. I might feed all my plants in my next grow and just switch over to REMO period. I calculated with there calculator I will still have some nutrients left over I am thinking really hard.
 
@Rebel subbed up got me front row seats [emoji1] [emoji1] [emoji1] good luck man I'm using remos too I'm loving it sooooo far super simple

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320A using Tapatalk

Sweet! Awesome Izzy!! Thanks for joining the party man! Do you have a link to your thread I'd love to follow!

:pass: Green grow karma to you as well Izzy!! :d5:
 
If this is a good as it gets AS @Rebel and @IzzyTheGrower says which I believe them wholeheartedly. I might feed all my plants in my next grow and just switch over to REMO period. I calculated with there calculator I will still have some nutrients left over I am thinking really hard.
Dude your going to feel like Remo himself.... hahaha they're rocking it

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320A using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top