I can't recall anyone doing a comparison like this but no doubt its been done before. It would be interesting to see what others noticed because mine is just one case. So if you have some thoughts on this from past work with autopots vs non-autopots it would be great if you shared.
I have 8 autopot tray/valve/air (2.5 gallon pots) kits. For my recent grow I germinated 10 because I was expecting a couple of fails. I kept all 10 and with a pair each of Sweet Nurse CBD and Forgotten Strawberries I put 1 in the proper autpots and 1 in an autopot that doesn't get air or the bottom feeding system (hand watering only).
The autopots had air domes turned on around day 10 and the res and aquavalves on day 20. This is now day 27 so the autopot system has been running for a full week now.
I did weigh them and the autopots come in around 12 lbs and the non-autopots at 6 lbs. Clearly the autopots hold a lot of fluid compared to my top hand watered pots.
I'll update this at least once more at the end of the grow. Maybe one before that too. And I'll have a look at the roots when its all done too. That might be more interesting.
At this point now I can't see a difference between the autopot vs non-autopot plants. Its not an exact science comparing plants from seed like say compared to testing with clones, but I think all the plants here are the same pheno because they look so similar so its close enough. Anyway, I was expecting autopots to be a lot "better" than non-autopots if not for the airdomes alone, not to mention the continuous bottom feeding in a coco medium. BTW the plants were also tied thru days 10 to 20 too when it was really a comparison of airdomes vs non-airdomes.
So nothing mind blowing to show unfortunately.
Sweet Seeds Nurse CBD Day 27
Autopot on left and non-autopot on right
side and top views
.
.
Forgotten Strawberries Day 27
Autopot on left and non-autopot on right
side and top views
I had to manipulate the autopot one more than the other so there is some difference because of that. The non-autpot one is a bit taller at this point.
I have 8 autopot tray/valve/air (2.5 gallon pots) kits. For my recent grow I germinated 10 because I was expecting a couple of fails. I kept all 10 and with a pair each of Sweet Nurse CBD and Forgotten Strawberries I put 1 in the proper autpots and 1 in an autopot that doesn't get air or the bottom feeding system (hand watering only).
The autopots had air domes turned on around day 10 and the res and aquavalves on day 20. This is now day 27 so the autopot system has been running for a full week now.
I did weigh them and the autopots come in around 12 lbs and the non-autopots at 6 lbs. Clearly the autopots hold a lot of fluid compared to my top hand watered pots.
I'll update this at least once more at the end of the grow. Maybe one before that too. And I'll have a look at the roots when its all done too. That might be more interesting.
At this point now I can't see a difference between the autopot vs non-autopot plants. Its not an exact science comparing plants from seed like say compared to testing with clones, but I think all the plants here are the same pheno because they look so similar so its close enough. Anyway, I was expecting autopots to be a lot "better" than non-autopots if not for the airdomes alone, not to mention the continuous bottom feeding in a coco medium. BTW the plants were also tied thru days 10 to 20 too when it was really a comparison of airdomes vs non-airdomes.
So nothing mind blowing to show unfortunately.
Sweet Seeds Nurse CBD Day 27
Autopot on left and non-autopot on right
side and top views
.
.
Forgotten Strawberries Day 27
Autopot on left and non-autopot on right
side and top views
I had to manipulate the autopot one more than the other so there is some difference because of that. The non-autpot one is a bit taller at this point.
Last edited: