- Joined
- Jun 2, 2022
- Messages
- 2,187
- Reputation
- 2,491
- Reaction score
- 11,989
- Points
- 0
- Currently Smoking
- Homegrown!
I’m assuming that less GPD means a longer lasting filter so that could be an advantage
I’m assuming that less GPD means a longer lasting filter so that could be an advantage
200 gpd seems like overkill, unless you are operating on a commercial scale. If run 1/2-time, that's 100 gallons/day, enough for a lot of plants. Are you mostly looking for real-time delivery speed, fast flow vs. say periodically filling a large reservoir, using a float valve, etc.?On the suggestion of MOG I have a water softener in front of the ro so hopefully that helps the filters last longer.
But I think the 200GPD is in my future for sure
Wrong! A smaller pot will not "encourage" more feeding leading to more yield (per plant). A smaller pot provides less space and surface area for roots, limits nutrient uptake by the roots.....I’m thinking a smaller pot might dry quicker therefore encouraging more feeding leading to more yield? Not sure at all if that’s how it works but I’m gonna try it.....
I get 3 gal of waste water for 1 gal of good water. So your 100 = 33. The 50 is fine for now but I’d rather not take 3 hours to fill up a 5gal jug is all. I may ditch RO altogether as I’m seeing how much water I’m paying for to go to waste.200 gpd seems like overkill, unless you are operating on a commercial scale. If run 1/2-time, that's 100 gallons/day, enough for a lot of plants. Are you mostly looking for real-time delivery speed, fast flow vs. say periodically filling a large reservoir, using a float valve, etc.?
Surely RO system specs refer to the purified output, not the input/full throughput. Thus, a 200 gpd unit provides 200 gallons of purified water/day (>8 gal./hour).I get 3 gal of waste water for 1 gal of good water. So your 100 = 33. The 50 is fine for now but I’d rather not take 3 hours to fill up a 5gal jug is all. I may ditch RO altogether as I’m seeing how much water I’m paying for to go to waste.