So, question for all the older/more experienced heads: For someone totally new to hash how much difference is there, really, between the grades that
@budelee posted pics of? I mean, on one hand I just watched a video of some dude rubbing and stomping on a baseball-sized lump of kief that looked like dirt, and then a few posts down we're talking about how there's too much vegetation, stalks, and immature resin glands in a 73 micron dry ice hash run that's blonde and pristine looking.
I guess what I'm wondering is (and I'm sure it's subjective to a point) - what's "good" hash and what's bad? Is it simply dependent on personal taste and what's "correct" for a particular style of hash, or? As a noob, it's a bit confusing.