Maybe someday with genetics, things will be traced down the line, I know chimera is doing gene testing and a friend has even sent him some Mighty Mite seeds, because we wonder was it a lie from the beginning being a Landrace Himalayan auto or is it just a ruderalis....
hmmm... well i have this gut feeling that auto genetics are much more widespread that what we think.
Ill just refer to the conversation LBH linked in the first post of this thread where he quotes neville.
my first question for neville
while none are noted in the catalouges ,im very curious as too what haze hybrids have you created using the haze female B?
The subject of Haze keeps coming up.
I got mine from Sam the Skunkman in the 80's. I bought a couple of thousand of old stock late 60s/ 70. The first batch that I planted produced one plant, a female. It was the slowest to flower I'd ever come across and flowered for longer. I got 3 different crops of seed of it and it had still not finished. It was huge and filled a quarter of the room, it had wispy buds and when you smoked it, other people complained about the smell. It didn't have much resin and after 9 months flowering, with no end in sight, I chopped it. It seem the most impractical plant I'd ever grown. I didn't keep a cutting.
One of the males I crossed it with was Ruderalis x NL1 X NL1. I was testing a 25% Ruderalis male on the most difficult plant I'd come across to see what it would do. I used all the seed I had to find the earliest male for the next generation. I grew the females out and because it was so resinous, I made hash out of it. To this day it was the best hash I've ever smoked, and I've been privileged to have smoked the best.
I truly regret not having made a cutting of that plant. I didn't make that mistake with the 6 that followed.
I'm feeling a bit sad now, I think that I'll go and have a smoke.
I'll tell you the rest later.
N.
Hi LBH
to get back to your question.
When I first started using Ruderalis, I was trying to eradicate everything from the wild plant except the early flowering gene. NL1 was the opposite of Ruderalis, so I crossed it with that and then put the earliest son back to the mother. The earliest son from that was put to a Haze and I grew the offspring outdoors in Holland. I started flowering early, but didn't finish in the short Dutch Autumn. Still, I had some outdoor Haze bud in Holland.
I also crossed the R.1x1 to NL5 about 8 times, always using males that flowered at the 4th internode. It peaked after 5 back-crosses and didn't get better after that.
I never did NL5r X NL5r like I was planning to, ended up in jail instead.
It's up to you now mate, there is a good selection of Haze type available to cross it to.
N.
Originally Posted by neville
Ruderalis.Shady LadyxNL1 X NL1. I wanted to see how the Ruderalis gene would cope with the most difficult plant in the world. I just threw a handful of these seeds in a large pot with rockwool and chopped the males. They were ripe before the mother. I hung them on the line and more or less forgot about them. After I smoked the mother, I went looking for them and decided to make hash out of it. It had been dry for a while and it was brittle. It had plenty of resin which started coming off the buds as I moved them. It was the best damn hash that I've ever smoked
-
.. and then if we consider what LBH says too in his initial post;
My theory of AF/Lowryder's
i think someone had worked on the Ruderalis.Shady LadyxNL1 beans from Nevil(ore other of his ruder crosses) and found some autoflowering and worked furter on it and the legend of the
mexican ruder/autoflower AKA Loweryder whas born
Maybe more then one of Nevilles early crosses showed especially early traits, from these early genetics could have come some of your famous early or semi auto american guerilla strains such as the guerilla gold, the mighty freeze, the auto affie etc etc
I have a feeling that all this hysteria around keeping the socalled "early" genetics free from auto genes is just chasing the tail if i could say it that way.
And why are we seeing autos in the f1 generation in crosses between autos and indicas?
https://www.autoflower.org/f2/autoflowering-@-f1-photo-auto-cross-5216.html
My first obvious answer would be that there must be auto genes in the makeup of these indicas. They show many other similar characteristics, such as the dark color, dense buds, quick maturity .. etc
But ofc this is all speculation since all seed banks claim their indicas derive from pure afghan IBL land races.
..so we are left to believe that, what else can we do.. even if indicas seem to be able to produce fully automatic offspring...
i guess this duck is a goose.. said the farmer!