I am afraid the results were not good enough.
Test auto#1 was hoped to give really good yields via longer lifetime, a long life super auto. But the stability we needed was not there I am afraid. maybe we will resurect the idea in future, maybe not. We had mails saying it was the ultimate idea for a plant that would outyield anything else. Others said that a 15-week auto had no advantages over photoperiod varieties. Personally I like the idea even if it is only a small minority of customers that would like it
Test auto#5 was a great genetic heritage but I believe the seed quality was not up to standard so we will scrap them all. Some of the seedlings did not look healthy enough.
So bad news and my apologies to the test growers who I have mailed. As always we will make things right with these folks.
It doesnt always go to plan and sometimes you have to hold your hands up and admit it, no point introducing something that isn't up to standard
tony
Test auto#1 was hoped to give really good yields via longer lifetime, a long life super auto. But the stability we needed was not there I am afraid. maybe we will resurect the idea in future, maybe not. We had mails saying it was the ultimate idea for a plant that would outyield anything else. Others said that a 15-week auto had no advantages over photoperiod varieties. Personally I like the idea even if it is only a small minority of customers that would like it
Test auto#5 was a great genetic heritage but I believe the seed quality was not up to standard so we will scrap them all. Some of the seedlings did not look healthy enough.
So bad news and my apologies to the test growers who I have mailed. As always we will make things right with these folks.
It doesnt always go to plan and sometimes you have to hold your hands up and admit it, no point introducing something that isn't up to standard
tony