I run continuous, 24 x 7, other than turning off the lights for about 6 hours every 3-4 days (2x/week). I hope to get whatever benefits, such as from plants 'resting,' that may be worthwhile pursing by not going fully 24x7, and any benefits from more cumulative light (from not going dark daily). I can't say anything about this working well or not.
Myself: I presume plants can sense, are aware of, and even can react to diurnal/daily rhythms of long periods of light exposure and darkness (day/night; how they evolved). But I don't think they (or at least our weeds with auto genes) particularly need the diurnal rhythms or darkness. In terms of 'bro science,' I presume it (or common knowledge) tells us that 24x7 vs. daily darkness are pretty much comparable. If these weren't, if one way was actually significantly better, we'd all know that already.
But what do others think of such a schedule involving turning off the lights 2x/week? Would this theoretically or is this known to be better or worse than going 24x7 say vs. 18/6 daily? A good compromise? Too much added stress?
Myself: I presume plants can sense, are aware of, and even can react to diurnal/daily rhythms of long periods of light exposure and darkness (day/night; how they evolved). But I don't think they (or at least our weeds with auto genes) particularly need the diurnal rhythms or darkness. In terms of 'bro science,' I presume it (or common knowledge) tells us that 24x7 vs. daily darkness are pretty much comparable. If these weren't, if one way was actually significantly better, we'd all know that already.
But what do others think of such a schedule involving turning off the lights 2x/week? Would this theoretically or is this known to be better or worse than going 24x7 say vs. 18/6 daily? A good compromise? Too much added stress?