The plant seems to have very long inter nodal spacing which is due to the L.E.D. distance from the canopy.
I placed the L.E.D. at the height recommend here on site but from my experience this information incorrect.
In future i will keep the Light between 30-40cm above the seedling rather than the recommended 40-50cm.

My Grownorthern HS1 has been confusing me. It certainly doesn't 'appear' as bright as 50 watts of CFLs. I measured the HS1 lumens with a light meter and it seems low: 15,000 lumens at 35 cm directly under the LEDs. My Hubbabubbasmelloscope was very leggy too, I thought maybe my light was dirty, maybe defective or weak LEDS.

Now I am thinking that I measured wrong, my cheap light meter is tuned to visible light but more that half the HS1 LEDS are infrared. And Hubbabubbasmelloscope seem to be leggy by nature.

The leaves on my Sour Crack plant show stress if the light is closer than 30 cm directly under the LED. I think you are right, I like 40 cm above the seedling. BUT it makes a huge difference if the seedling is directly under the LED or or not. The HSI diffuser definitely helps spread the light more smoothly, but "holographic" is marketing hype. Light intensity quickly drops farther from the center. At 20 cm off center it is down to 50%. Also 50% at 30 cm the other axis (I have the 60x90 diffuser) The diffuser helps smooth the gradient but it does NOT give an even blanket of light intensity.

I am thinking I need a Bowl of Green, not a Sea of Green to maximize grams per watt and give even light to all the plants.
 
Last edited:
My Grownorthern HS1 has been confusing me. It certainly doesn't 'appear' as bright as 50 watts of CFLs. I measured the HS1 lumens with a light meter and it seems low: 15,000 lumens at 35 cm directly under the LEDs. My Hubbabubbasmelloscope was very leggy too, I though maybe my light was dirty, maybe defective or weak LEDS.
.

I too am far from impressed with my HS1's,

I purchased 4 to replace 2 x 600w hps lights and their is no way in hell that these lights are as powerful as advertised.

The trichome production and bud quality is amazing but the yield is less than half and penetration intensity leaves alot to be desired. NO WAY do these lights compare to 250w hps each.

Anybody considering buying these should really hold off for some more completed grow journals prior to dropping your hard earned coin.

After reading tangs logs in order to create optimum temp conditions Ive added 3x 180w topled ufos to ramp up the heat for my next grow to see if this improves things as my current temps are at 23c / 45rh with the 4 hs1s running in a small 800mm x 1450mm x 2100mm tent.

I hope I can report a more positive experience in a few more months.

:bong:
 
My Grownorthern HS1 has been confusing me. It certainly doesn't 'appear' as bright as 50 watts of CFLs. I measured the HS1 lumens with a light meter and it seems low: 15,000 lumens at 35 cm directly under the LEDs. My Hubbabubbasmelloscope was very leggy too, I thought maybe my light was dirty, maybe defective or weak LEDS.

Now I am thinking that I measured wrong, my cheap light meter is tuned to visible light but more that half the HS1 LEDS are infrared. And Hubbabubbasmelloscope seem to be leggy by nature.

The leaves on my Sour Crack plant show stress if the light is closer than 30 cm directly under the LED. I think you are right, I like 40 cm above the seedling. BUT it makes a huge difference if the seedling is directly under the LED or or not. The HSI diffuser definitely helps spread the light more smoothly, but "holographic" is marketing hype. Light intensity quickly drops farther from the center. At 20 cm off center it is down to 50%. Also 50% at 30 cm the other axis (I have the 60x90 diffuser) The diffuser helps smooth the gradient but it does NOT give an even blanket of light intensity.

I am thinking I need a Bowl of Green, not a Sea of Green to maximize grams per watt and give even light to all the plants.
Hi HubbaBubba
Im not great with technical matters but i can give a fair judgement of the performance from what i have seen so far from the Hs1 since i switched from Hps just after Christmas.
I agree the light intensity coverage area isnt as much as a CFl or even 250w Hps for that matter. Should definitely have two units to cover a 1.2mx1.2m area or else there is just not enough light.
I honestly dont think its fair to measure an LED with a luximeter to record the lumen output as from what i read other variables come into play when comparing LEDs to other lights.
Over all i am happy with the new units and for the efficiency and cost they run at i cant complain.
I too am far from impressed with my HS1's,

I purchased 4 to replace 2 x 600w hps lights and their is no way in hell that these lights are as powerful as advertised.

The trichome production and bud quality is amazing but the yield is less than half and penetration intensity leaves alot to be desired. NO WAY do these lights compare to 250w hps each.

Anybody considering buying these should really hold off for some more completed grow journals prior to dropping your hard earned coin.

After reading tangs logs in order to create optimum temp conditions Ive added 3x 180w topled ufos to ramp up the heat for my next grow to see if this improves things as my current temps are at 23c / 45rh with the 4 hs1s running in a small 800mm x 1450mm x 2100mm tent.

I hope I can report a more positive experience in a few more months.

:bong:
Hi Puffman
Im sorry to read your not to happy with the New GN LEDS.
I agree with you that the penetration of the unit is nothing compared to HPS but i think if you want to get good results, you might need to be a little more creative in the way you hang your units.
For instance if i was growing one plant in flower in a 1.2mx1.2m space i would use two lights hung vertically up top and then maybe half way down i might hang the other two along the side to penetrate the lower half of the plant.

Yes there is a loss of heat when changing over from HPS but this will happen with any LED unit.
I user a radiator with a thermostat to keep my temps up and it works fine.
I have seen good results from my last grow using these new units, but i trained the plant to have an even canopy thus it made it easier to get better light penetration.
I had rock solid buds from a tiny plant in a small pot, less than 10L and still yielded 3 oz.
I believe that two units together under one or maybe two plants can be the equivalent of max 500w HPS but no more than that.
In my experience to get the best results and maximize the performance of the units you can only share at least two lights with one plant.

Hopefully you give the units a fair trial before making you mind up definitively.
Id also love to know how you feel about them after a few months.
Happy growing dudes.
 
Over all i am happy with the new units and for the efficiency and cost they run at i cant complain.

Thank Grim Reefer, I am still figuring out how to get the most out of the HS1, I have not finished my first grow with it yet. You pros make it look easy. My next plant under HS1 will definitely get LST to get more light to all the leaves.
 
Last edited:
Yall are so lucky having low temps!! Lol I wish!!
Its horrible outside though as its meant to be middle of the summer and its raining, only in Ireland.
Thank Grim Reefer, I am still figuring out how to get the most out of the HS1, I have not finished my first grow with it yet. You pros make it look easy. My next plant will definitely get LST to get more light to all the leaves.
Thanks for the kind words dude.
LST is the way to go in my opinion especially to make the most out of the LED.
 
Week: 4 - Day: 25

PSPmf5j.jpg


This young plant hasnt shown sex yet and she is not quite yet at the stage where growth noticeably excels.

J9jevZ0.jpg


At the beginning of this week i added some extra Calcium & Magnesium to the nutrient solution.
The next day I noticed small rust spots developing in small patches on the lower and older leaves.

My first thought was:
"Great I have added too much for the young plant and now Calcium & Magnesium have been locked out"

When i thought about it more, i realised that if Calcium was locked out, so too should Magnesium as they usually lock one another out. I have concluded that I added the Calcium & Magnesium just at the right time but just not enough.
Therefore next week i will be upping the dosage of Calcium & Magnesium, hopefully in order to combat this deficiency.

It8yhRY.jpg


The roots although heavily stained from TNC - Bactor, seem to be coming along fine.
I have been keeping my eyes on the inside of the DWC bin and still no signs of root rot.


Nutrient Solution:

  • PH: 5.8
  • EC: 1.3 ( 1.6)
  • Temp: 22 C

Environment:

  • Lights On: 24-25 C
  • Lights OFF: 19-20 C
  • RH%: 40-50%
 
girl looking nice grim she picking up just nice,TNC - Bactor seem to be doing it job :thumbsup:,im up my girl ec too 1.0 wont to see how she like it,look forward to seeing your next up date im going to run some CLAY PEBBLES,in my flood and drain on my next run,:passit:PicSketch-2015-03-20-23-48-13.jpg
 
girl looking nice grim she picking up just nice,TNC - Bactor seem to be doing it job :thumbsup:,im up my girl ec too 1.0 wont to see how she like it,look forward to seeing your next up date im going to run some CLAY PEBBLES,in my flood and drain on my next run,:passit:View attachment 470148
Thanks Kudo
Yeah the TNC Bactor seems pretty good so far.
Nice one dude.
 
Week: 5 - Day: 29

RMXnAYd.jpg


This young plant has finally shown sex today and its about time. This is the first strain I have grown to show sex so late.

4U3QKYt.jpg


I have noticed over the last week that this plant is showing signs of major Nitrogen toxicity.
This week I have made sure to cut out CANNA's Rhizotonic completely as it has a lot of Nitrogen and it wont really be utilized by the plant at this stage of the grow.

Q9pXnSK.jpg


I also made sure to keep bottle A of the grow nutrients at the same amount as last week while increasing bottle B.
The reason for doing this is because bottle A of Advanced Nutrients Sensi Grow has very heavy amounts of Nitrogen and no Phosphorus or Potassium at all. While on the other hand bottle B has a very small amount of Nitrogen and the correct amounts of Phosphorus and Potassium.

This Weeks Feed:

Base Nutrients:
  • Advanced Nutrients - Sensi Grow A+B
Nutrient Additives:
  • CANNA - Zym
  • CANNA - Mono Calcium
  • CANNA - Mono Magnesium
  • Grotek - Silicon
Beneficial Additives:
  • TNC - Bactor
Nutrient Solution:
  • PH: 5.8
  • EC: 1.6 ( 1.9)
  • Temp: 23 C

Environment:

  • Lights On: 24-25 C
  • Lights OFF: 21-22 C
  • RH%: 40-50%
 
Back
Top