I know that the addition of the UV, IR and deep red will make a difference.
Yield or quality diff ? Is it just a small difference or is it something considerable?
I know that the addition of the UV, IR and deep red will make a difference.
A quality difference. The trichomes are bigger and cover the leaves as well as the buds. For me I would not buy a new light without them.Yield or quality diff ? Is it just a small difference or is it something considerable?
A quality difference. The trichomes are bigger and cover the leaves as well as the buds. For me I would not buy a new light without them.
its both, IR combined with red etc causes the wonderful Emerson effect resulting in increased yields UV and Blue waves typically seem to lead to better quality how ever (this part I learned from dan from the green sunshine company in a video he did with mr grow it about LED lights, watch it) he says that plants over time will adjust to uv light and at that point your just better off with a light with more blue in it.Thank you very much brother ... thanks alot
Thanks for your input. Since I grow only auto's and do not breed them I feel that there is no way they will get used to it.its both, IR combined with red etc causes the wonderful Emerson effect resulting in increased yields UV and Blue waves typically seem to lead to better quality how ever (this part I learned from dan from the green sunshine company in a video he did with mr grow it about LED lights, watch it) he says that plants over time will adjust to uv light and at that point your just better off with a light with more blue in it.
Thanks for your input. Since I grow only auto's and do not breed them I feel that there is no way they will get used to it.
So you plan to give different light to parts of the plant ("blocking off half a plant"). This would be testing based on assumption that plant response to light frequency/wavelength is localized to the exposed tissues. But I'd presume that the "make more resin, faster" response we want from the plant is more systemic in nature, auxin/hormone-dependent, affecting the whole plant. Half light exposure to the plant is just going to result in that much less response (or maybe no response).....I have tried uva and the reds I'm not convinced yet but I also haven't ran any side by side I wouldn't mind blocking off half a plant in flower and weigh each to see or something as auto genetics aren't stable enuff for real weight between 2 plants......
Ya I don't no that it will or will not work but I'm just saying it's hard to compare let's just take auto ultimate from Dutch Passion I've grown a few 6.5oz plants but I've also grown 3.5oz plants in same medium and lights ect and I see lots of this so it's very difficult to say reds help I'm in middle of a qb96v2 and my strips grow waiting on results to see as I've got a few strains in each that are the same but it's going to be difficult to notice any difference I think, none so farSo you plan to give different light to parts of the plant ("blocking off half a plant"). This would be testing based on assumption that plant response to light frequency/wavelength is localized to the exposed tissues. But I'd presume that the "make more resin, faster" response we want from the plant is more systemic in nature, auxin/hormone-dependent, affecting the whole plant. Half light exposure to the plant is just going to result in that much less response (or maybe no response).