Status
Not open for further replies.
A thing of beauty even if I do say so myself . :biggrin:
DSCN1454.JPG
 
U could have a double parody here .......ever been to buckie the fishin town ...........they speak buckanese and are a seriously hardy breed shall we say [emoji111]

Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
nah not been up there yet but ive heard their women are harrier than the men and their hamburgers actually eat people!
 
nah not been up there yet but ive heard their women are harrier than the men and their hamburgers actually eat people!
Browse
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
#
new
Vote
Store
Cart
Your cart is empty!
Visit the store
Arabic
Azerbaijani
Bengali
Bulgarian
Chinese
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Filipino
French
German
Greek
Hebrew
Hungarian
Indonesian
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Norwegian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Spanish
Swedish
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Help translate!

Type any word...

TOP DEFINITION
Buckie Flick
When ones thumb is lodged up a womans rear and index finger is firmly placed inside the front bottom, a flicking/snapping motion is then used.
I used her like a bowling bowl last night, i gave her a Buckie Flick.
[HASHTAG]#buckie[/HASHTAG] click#fisting#thumb bum#poke#orgasmic
by Sinky January 16, 2009
4720
Mug icon
The Urban Dictionary Mug

One side has the word, one side has the definition. Microwave and dishwasher safe. Lotsa space for your liquids.

BUY THE MUG

[emoji767] 1999-2017 Urban Dictionary [emoji768]
advertise terms of service
privacy dmca remove help

Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
 
Largest absolution for marijuana in Spain

08/08/2017

The great work of lawyers Brotsanbert will be of great help for future rulings to self-cultivators of marijuana.
We are not accustomed to the mainstream media to publish news or articles on marijuana without negative connotations and, much less, that the tight schedule of television programming includes our beloved plant in any of its programs or newsreels.



On June 8, in the Television Broadcasting of 21 hours of Spanish Television, after several important topics of the day, a photograph with plants of marijuana in vegetative state appears in the chroma behind the presenter. The news with that background image is located in Fuerteventura, two people have been acquitted after the seizure in their home, by the Guardia Civil, of 22 kilos of marijuana.

Absolution in the absence of evidence.
In September 2013 two Italian nationals were prosecuted for a crime against public health after finding 22 kilos and a half of marijuana and 91 grams of hashish in their homes. Three and a half years later, thanks to the Brotsanbert law firm , Judge Alicia María Buendía concluded the acquittal of both people in early June, as there was no evidence that they were using marijuana in their possession. " After examining in detail each of the tests carried out, it is not possible to appreciate the tendential mood that necessarily has to concur in the crime against public health ," he says.

Different mainstream media with online presence, as well as other alternative information platforms, have echoed this news throughout the month. The legal study Brotsanbert has reported the case in more detail.



Penalty and administrative penalty.
The two Italian detainees were facing a four-year and three-month prison sentence, as well as an administrative fine of € 102,000 for a crime against public health. As Brotons explained to the media, both made therapeutic use of marijuana seized, one of them being a person with reduced mobility with medical prescription in Italy for such treatment, which could have been facilitated by their country of origin Where there is regulation on medicinal cannabis .

Therapeutic use of marijuana.
Marijuana helps them alleviate chronic pains of cervical, dorsal and knee - a result of a traffic accident -, and to combat a heart disease and pathologies derived from the specific medication for it.
Due to the high cost of this treatment and the good variables and climatic conditions for their health and the cultivation of marijuana in the Canary Islands, they decided to move to Fuerteventura.

Before this event, no resident in Spain had gone unpunished with such quantities, this case " constitutes the largest collection of this substance declared non-criminal until now in Spain ."

More than 200 or 300gr is considered traffic.
The protocols used to follow the Supreme Court in these circumstances was that with quantities over 200 or 300 grams, automatically, it was considered traffic. Thanks to the incessant work of people like Hector Brotons and Alejandro Amorós, little by little the framework of sentences is extended that not only favor their protagonists, but they are important for all marijuana growers and consumers .

This ruling has been very helpful since it has been made clear to the Supreme Court that strong guidelines can not be followed to rule whether a person is innocent or not and that the amount does not have to indicate that the substance is intended for trafficking , So this case will be of great help to open the door to crops for own consumption that are adapted to the needs of each consumer.
 
upload_2017-8-12_12-14-15.png
Gorilla Glue lawsuit: Cannabis biz stuck in the middle of branding battle over strain name

The entrepreneurs behind GG Strains built their brand on the popularity of award-winning Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG]. The company that makes Gorilla Glue adhesives wants its name back.

This origin story is the stuff of legend in the cannabis world.

Back in 2012, A Nevada medical marijuana cultivator working under the under the uniquely spelled pseudonym “Joesy Whales” was trimming a new plant born from a happenstance encounter between established strains Chem’s Sister, Sour Dubb and Chocolate Diesel.

The phone rang.

When Whales, whose real name is Jackie Don Peabody, answered the call, the resin secreted by the flower caused his hands to stick to the phone like glue.

The hybrid marijuana strain was thus christened: Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG].

But the branding inspired by an innocent story of inception has now landed the fabled breeders of the highly decorated, extremely potent and wildly popular Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG] in an even stickier legal situation.

The Gorilla Glue Company — maker of adhesive products such as Gorilla Glue, Gorilla Epoxy and Gorilla Tape — is suing Peabody, founding partner Ross Johnson and their company GG Strains LLC, alleging trademark infringement, dilution, unfair competition and cybersquatting. By licensing and marketing products under “confusingly similar” names, GG Strains is ultimately trading on the reputation and goodwill that the family-run, Sharonville, Ohio-based company built over 23 years of business, according to the March 24 complaint.

Although not the first litigation of its kind in the cannabis industry, the case represents another coming-of-age moment for the maturing legal industry: The fun-loving, guerrilla marketing of marijuana’s underground heyday is now being viewed in the same light as that of traditional industry.

As Gorilla Glue Co. moves to protect a brand built over more than two decades, the entrepreneurs behind GG Strains said a loss wouldn’t just be detrimental to their company, it would also set an awful precedent for intellectual property in the cannabis industry.

“We’re not millionaires, we’re cannabis breeders and cultivators,” GG Strains’ Johnson told The Cannabist. “Most people have backed down from corporate businesses, so no case has set precedent as of yet. Down the line, this (case) will set the precedent.”

No longer an underground concern

The court complaint filed by Gorilla Glue Co. is 140 pages, laden with lists and images of the company’s trademarks juxtaposed with pictures from GG Strains’ state trademark applications, which include cartoon art such as a sunglasses-wearing gorilla smoking a blunt with one hand and holding an award chalice in the other.

Another exhibit includes a screenshot of Facebook search results for “gorilla glue” — it shows an alternating mix of posts about repaired coffee mugs and images of trichome-covered nugs.

GG Strains’ apparent ambitions with respect to continued use and growth of the name has increased as medical and recreational use of marijuana have been legalized in more and more states, Gorilla Glue Co.’s complaint alleges.

“This lawsuit is not a comment on any federal or state policy matters, medical or pharmaceutical issues, or choices in recreation,” the complaint states. “But Gorilla Glue has a famous, valuable brand built through tremendous products and strong consumer confidence, and as a business matter must take appropriate steps to protect its rights.”

GG Strains is no longer an underground concern, said Gorilla Glue Co.’s attorney Thomas F. Hankinson, a partner with the Cincinnati firm Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL.

“It is a business that should be held to the same standards of fair play in branding that apply to all other businesses,” Hankinson told The Cannabist. “GG Strains not only took the name, but intentionally traded on Gorilla Glue’s reputation for high-quality adhesives’ ‘stickiness.'”

Gorilla Glue Co. officials declined to be interviewed for this story, citing the ongoing legal matter and referred questions to attorney Hankinson.

“Gorilla Glue (Co.) just wants to protect its brand and communicate reliably with its customers through that brand,” Hankinson said.

“GG Strains’ side of this case is ironic,” he added. “Their whole business model is making cannabis industry players pay a license fee for the name, which they don’t even own. So when they pitch it as ‘Gorilla Glue versus cannabis,’ that is far from the case.”

“The dominoes have already started to fall”

While the outcome of Gorilla Glue Co. v. GG Strains could influence future trademark cases in and beyond the cannabis industry, the lawsuit isn’t terribly surprising, intellectual property attorneys told The Cannabist.

The case should stand as a stark reminder for other marijuana firms that they’re no longer operating in the shadows, said Amanda F. Conley, a partner at Oakland, Calif.-based Brand & Branch LLP, which provides intellectual-property legal services to the cannabis, technology, gaming and publishing industries.

“If anything, it’s surprising it took so long,” she said.

Mainstream brands already have been eyeing the cannabis industry, said Shabnam Malek, a Brand & Branch partner and president of the National Cannabis Bar Association.

In 2014, The Hershey Co. sued Colorado Springs-based TinctureBelle for breaching design and name patents by selling edibles that resembled Reese’s, Almond Joy and Heath candy bars. Months later, TinctureBelle settled, agreeing to recall and destroy its edibles — with names such as Reefers, Ganja Joy and Hasheath — that looked like Hershey products.

The Girl Scouts of the United States of America have sent out demand letters to dispensaries, requesting they cease selling marijuana with the Girl Scout Cookies name, Conley observed.

Several of Brand & Branch’s cannabis clients have been approached by mainstream companies alleging infringement, Malek said.

“The dominoes have already started to fall,” she said.

The cannabis industry does have unique concerns relative to trademark matters, both attorneys said.

For instance, businesses that previously operated in the shadows don’t have the luxury of establishing years of use for a trade or design mark. Likewise, the companies might not have been able to avail themselves of legal services because of bar association restrictions.

Furthermore, strain names can be considered varietals, and thus are not capable of serving as trademarks, and common-law trademark rights are limited to geography, creating issues when a cannabis company looking to expand out of state via licensing encounters another company of the same name.

“One issue that we still haven’t really tested,” Conley said, “is to what extent a cannabis company can assert trademark rights in federal court.”

The bottom line, she said, is that cannabis companies should be prepared to rebrand if they believe they are violating another firm’s trademarks.

“We’re not selling glue”

Faced with the prospect of conflict with The Gorilla Glue Co., GG Strains did indeed remarket their award-winning marijuana strains this spring, said the company’s interim CEO Catherine M. Franklin. Gorilla Glues [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG], [HASHTAG]#1[/HASHTAG] and [HASHTAG]#5[/HASHTAG] are now marketed as GG#4, GG#1, and GG#5.

However, it’s tricky for GG Strains to ensure those rebranding practices extend everywhere cultivators are growing, dispensaries are selling and consumers are seeking the famous strain, Franklin said. And sometimes, strains advertised and sold as Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG] aren’t actually grown from GG Strains’ proprietary plant genetics, she added.

Following GG Strains’ rebranding efforts, Gorilla Glue Co. offered to settle the case, Franklin said. That initial settlement offer was a no-go, she said, because it required GG Strains to relinquish its website, gorillaglue4.com, and trademarks.

Said GG Strains company partner Johnson: “If we settle with these guys outside of court, they’re going to go after everybody,” referring to the cultivators and dispensaries that grow and sell the strain, along with the merchandise they produce referencing the strains.

The cannabis company argues that the two brands should coexist — much akin to Delta Airlines and Delta Faucet, or Dove soap and Dove Chocolate.

“We’re not selling glue,” Franklin said, claiming that Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG] was denied a federal trademark because it was cannabis, not because they were violating trademarks on similarly named products.

“It was a name that kind of stuck,” she said. “We didn’t piggyback off anything. Nobody is buying this thing because they like glue.”

Another fight: Which court should hear case?

Jurisdiction for the case is also a serious concern for GG Strains.

The Gorilla Glue Co. filed the suit in its home state of Ohio. GG Strains, on the other hand, argues that the battle should play out in Nevada, where the company operates.

The lawsuit was filed in Ohio federal district court because Gorilla Glue Co. alleges that “one or more residents in Ohio have purchased clothing directly through defendant’s website, the defendant received payment from Ohio through its website, and the clothing was shipped to Ohio.”

GG Strains officials claim they were “baited” into the Ohio courtroom. They allege that only two purchases from Ohio were made through GG Strains’ website, and that those purchases were made by Gorilla Glue Co.’s chairman and a vice president.

GG Strains company partner Johnson said that were the case to move forward in Ohio, it would put immense strain on the Las Vegas-based company and adversely affect the health of defendant Peabody, who requires dialysis.

“We’re not the youngest,” Johnson said. “(Peabody is) 63, I’m 59. For us to go fight a battle in Ohio … it would literally be impossible for us to do it correctly.”

“They’re going to listen to Joesy Whales”

Settlement talks between Gorilla Glue Co. and GG Strains have been rekindled in recent days.

On Wednesday, attorney Hankinson told The Cannabist that Gorilla Glue planned to reenter settlement talks. He confirmed that he had previous settlement talks with GG Strains’ founders, interim CEO and lawyer, but said he could not comment on the specifics of the discussions, citing confidentiality agreements.

“We can say that GG Strains backed away from prior conversations and shut down the negotiations,” he said. “We’re certainly still open to it.”

GG Strains’ Franklin confirmed that a request to reenter settlement talks was made, but said her firm had some needs of its own.

The cannabis company is seeking a two-year transition period during which it can work with cultivators and dispensaries to rebrand Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG] to GG#4.

The transition period would also help GG Strains rein in the unauthorized activity, Franklin said.

“It would allow the celebrity status that GG#4 has achieved and maintain that (status) without having more people come in and be able to manipulate her,” she said, adding that she was confident the growers of GG#4 — even those growing unauthorized strains — would work with GG Strains to stay on the right side of the law.

“They’re going to listen to Joesy Whales before they listen to the Gorilla Glue (Co.),” she said, referring to Peabody’s popular pseudonym.

Considering Peabody’s state of health and inability to travel, GG Strains officials said they’ve requested that Gorilla Glue Co. executives travel to Las Vegas for any settlement discussions.

“We want to see if we can work together,” Johnson said Wednesday. “Sit down mano to mano, owner to owner, creator to creator and see what happens.”
 
wow great find bear! Thanks for sharing brother!:d5::smoking:

Here is a High Times article of the Top 40 landrace strains of the 70's
how things have changed eh?
Weed of the 70's was not so different from how ladies wore their intimate hair back them, all shaggy and bushy and looking like Don King after he'd been dragged through a bush backwards!
upload_2017-8-12_12-30-1.jpeg
Damn man trim that bitch!

These days ladies undergrowth (if they actual have some) is all neatly manicured, as are the buds we smoke, funny how fashion works innit!

hightimes.jpg

hightimes2.jpg

hightimes3.jpg
 
Gorilla Glue lawsuit: Cannabis biz stuck in the middle of branding battle over strain name

The entrepreneurs behind GG Strains built their brand on the popularity of award-winning Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG]. The company that makes Gorilla Glue adhesives wants its name back.

This origin story is the stuff of legend in the cannabis world.

Back in 2012, A Nevada medical marijuana cultivator working under the under the uniquely spelled pseudonym “Joesy Whales” was trimming a new plant born from a happenstance encounter between established strains Chem’s Sister, Sour Dubb and Chocolate Diesel.

The phone rang.

When Whales, whose real name is Jackie Don Peabody, answered the call, the resin secreted by the flower caused his hands to stick to the phone like glue.

The hybrid marijuana strain was thus christened: Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG].

But the branding inspired by an innocent story of inception has now landed the fabled breeders of the highly decorated, extremely potent and wildly popular Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG] in an even stickier legal situation.

The Gorilla Glue Company — maker of adhesive products such as Gorilla Glue, Gorilla Epoxy and Gorilla Tape — is suing Peabody, founding partner Ross Johnson and their company GG Strains LLC, alleging trademark infringement, dilution, unfair competition and cybersquatting. By licensing and marketing products under “confusingly similar” names, GG Strains is ultimately trading on the reputation and goodwill that the family-run, Sharonville, Ohio-based company built over 23 years of business, according to the March 24 complaint.

Although not the first litigation of its kind in the cannabis industry, the case represents another coming-of-age moment for the maturing legal industry: The fun-loving, guerrilla marketing of marijuana’s underground heyday is now being viewed in the same light as that of traditional industry.

As Gorilla Glue Co. moves to protect a brand built over more than two decades, the entrepreneurs behind GG Strains said a loss wouldn’t just be detrimental to their company, it would also set an awful precedent for intellectual property in the cannabis industry.

“We’re not millionaires, we’re cannabis breeders and cultivators,” GG Strains’ Johnson told The Cannabist. “Most people have backed down from corporate businesses, so no case has set precedent as of yet. Down the line, this (case) will set the precedent.”

No longer an underground concern

The court complaint filed by Gorilla Glue Co. is 140 pages, laden with lists and images of the company’s trademarks juxtaposed with pictures from GG Strains’ state trademark applications, which include cartoon art such as a sunglasses-wearing gorilla smoking a blunt with one hand and holding an award chalice in the other.

Another exhibit includes a screenshot of Facebook search results for “gorilla glue” — it shows an alternating mix of posts about repaired coffee mugs and images of trichome-covered nugs.

GG Strains’ apparent ambitions with respect to continued use and growth of the name has increased as medical and recreational use of marijuana have been legalized in more and more states, Gorilla Glue Co.’s complaint alleges.

“This lawsuit is not a comment on any federal or state policy matters, medical or pharmaceutical issues, or choices in recreation,” the complaint states. “But Gorilla Glue has a famous, valuable brand built through tremendous products and strong consumer confidence, and as a business matter must take appropriate steps to protect its rights.”

GG Strains is no longer an underground concern, said Gorilla Glue Co.’s attorney Thomas F. Hankinson, a partner with the Cincinnati firm Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL.

“It is a business that should be held to the same standards of fair play in branding that apply to all other businesses,” Hankinson told The Cannabist. “GG Strains not only took the name, but intentionally traded on Gorilla Glue’s reputation for high-quality adhesives’ ‘stickiness.'”

Gorilla Glue Co. officials declined to be interviewed for this story, citing the ongoing legal matter and referred questions to attorney Hankinson.

“Gorilla Glue (Co.) just wants to protect its brand and communicate reliably with its customers through that brand,” Hankinson said.

“GG Strains’ side of this case is ironic,” he added. “Their whole business model is making cannabis industry players pay a license fee for the name, which they don’t even own. So when they pitch it as ‘Gorilla Glue versus cannabis,’ that is far from the case.”

“The dominoes have already started to fall”

While the outcome of Gorilla Glue Co. v. GG Strains could influence future trademark cases in and beyond the cannabis industry, the lawsuit isn’t terribly surprising, intellectual property attorneys told The Cannabist.

The case should stand as a stark reminder for other marijuana firms that they’re no longer operating in the shadows, said Amanda F. Conley, a partner at Oakland, Calif.-based Brand & Branch LLP, which provides intellectual-property legal services to the cannabis, technology, gaming and publishing industries.

“If anything, it’s surprising it took so long,” she said.

Mainstream brands already have been eyeing the cannabis industry, said Shabnam Malek, a Brand & Branch partner and president of the National Cannabis Bar Association.

In 2014, The Hershey Co. sued Colorado Springs-based TinctureBelle for breaching design and name patents by selling edibles that resembled Reese’s, Almond Joy and Heath candy bars. Months later, TinctureBelle settled, agreeing to recall and destroy its edibles — with names such as Reefers, Ganja Joy and Hasheath — that looked like Hershey products.

The Girl Scouts of the United States of America have sent out demand letters to dispensaries, requesting they cease selling marijuana with the Girl Scout Cookies name, Conley observed.

Several of Brand & Branch’s cannabis clients have been approached by mainstream companies alleging infringement, Malek said.

“The dominoes have already started to fall,” she said.

The cannabis industry does have unique concerns relative to trademark matters, both attorneys said.

For instance, businesses that previously operated in the shadows don’t have the luxury of establishing years of use for a trade or design mark. Likewise, the companies might not have been able to avail themselves of legal services because of bar association restrictions.

Furthermore, strain names can be considered varietals, and thus are not capable of serving as trademarks, and common-law trademark rights are limited to geography, creating issues when a cannabis company looking to expand out of state via licensing encounters another company of the same name.

“One issue that we still haven’t really tested,” Conley said, “is to what extent a cannabis company can assert trademark rights in federal court.”

The bottom line, she said, is that cannabis companies should be prepared to rebrand if they believe they are violating another firm’s trademarks.

“We’re not selling glue”

Faced with the prospect of conflict with The Gorilla Glue Co., GG Strains did indeed remarket their award-winning marijuana strains this spring, said the company’s interim CEO Catherine M. Franklin. Gorilla Glues [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG], [HASHTAG]#1[/HASHTAG] and [HASHTAG]#5[/HASHTAG] are now marketed as GG#4, GG#1, and GG#5.

However, it’s tricky for GG Strains to ensure those rebranding practices extend everywhere cultivators are growing, dispensaries are selling and consumers are seeking the famous strain, Franklin said. And sometimes, strains advertised and sold as Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG] aren’t actually grown from GG Strains’ proprietary plant genetics, she added.

Following GG Strains’ rebranding efforts, Gorilla Glue Co. offered to settle the case, Franklin said. That initial settlement offer was a no-go, she said, because it required GG Strains to relinquish its website, gorillaglue4.com, and trademarks.

Said GG Strains company partner Johnson: “If we settle with these guys outside of court, they’re going to go after everybody,” referring to the cultivators and dispensaries that grow and sell the strain, along with the merchandise they produce referencing the strains.

The cannabis company argues that the two brands should coexist — much akin to Delta Airlines and Delta Faucet, or Dove soap and Dove Chocolate.

“We’re not selling glue,” Franklin said, claiming that Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG] was denied a federal trademark because it was cannabis, not because they were violating trademarks on similarly named products.

“It was a name that kind of stuck,” she said. “We didn’t piggyback off anything. Nobody is buying this thing because they like glue.”

Another fight: Which court should hear case?

Jurisdiction for the case is also a serious concern for GG Strains.

The Gorilla Glue Co. filed the suit in its home state of Ohio. GG Strains, on the other hand, argues that the battle should play out in Nevada, where the company operates.

The lawsuit was filed in Ohio federal district court because Gorilla Glue Co. alleges that “one or more residents in Ohio have purchased clothing directly through defendant’s website, the defendant received payment from Ohio through its website, and the clothing was shipped to Ohio.”

GG Strains officials claim they were “baited” into the Ohio courtroom. They allege that only two purchases from Ohio were made through GG Strains’ website, and that those purchases were made by Gorilla Glue Co.’s chairman and a vice president.

GG Strains company partner Johnson said that were the case to move forward in Ohio, it would put immense strain on the Las Vegas-based company and adversely affect the health of defendant Peabody, who requires dialysis.

“We’re not the youngest,” Johnson said. “(Peabody is) 63, I’m 59. For us to go fight a battle in Ohio … it would literally be impossible for us to do it correctly.”

“They’re going to listen to Joesy Whales”

Settlement talks between Gorilla Glue Co. and GG Strains have been rekindled in recent days.

On Wednesday, attorney Hankinson told The Cannabist that Gorilla Glue planned to reenter settlement talks. He confirmed that he had previous settlement talks with GG Strains’ founders, interim CEO and lawyer, but said he could not comment on the specifics of the discussions, citing confidentiality agreements.

“We can say that GG Strains backed away from prior conversations and shut down the negotiations,” he said. “We’re certainly still open to it.”

GG Strains’ Franklin confirmed that a request to reenter settlement talks was made, but said her firm had some needs of its own.

The cannabis company is seeking a two-year transition period during which it can work with cultivators and dispensaries to rebrand Gorilla Glue [HASHTAG]#4[/HASHTAG] to GG#4.

The transition period would also help GG Strains rein in the unauthorized activity, Franklin said.

“It would allow the celebrity status that GG#4 has achieved and maintain that (status) without having more people come in and be able to manipulate her,” she said, adding that she was confident the growers of GG#4 — even those growing unauthorized strains — would work with GG Strains to stay on the right side of the law.

“They’re going to listen to Joesy Whales before they listen to the Gorilla Glue (Co.),” she said, referring to Peabody’s popular pseudonym.

Considering Peabody’s state of health and inability to travel, GG Strains officials said they’ve requested that Gorilla Glue Co. executives travel to Las Vegas for any settlement discussions.

“We want to see if we can work together,” Johnson said Wednesday. “Sit down mano to mano, owner to owner, creator to creator and see what happens.”
"it was just a name that stuck" pardon the pun pmsl ,at least someones keeping a sense of humour about it

Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
 
are there any official world records for weed?my google doesnt seem to think so. found a royal queen amnezia at nearly 3 pounds apparently but cant find any official figures for anything. any suggestions folks?
and i did wonder about the gg thing. knew it was only a matter of time for that one lol
 
wow great find bear! Thanks for sharing brother!:d5::smoking:

Here is a High Times article of the Top 40 landrace strains of the 70's
how things have changed eh?
Weed of the 70's was not so different from how ladies wore their intimate hair back them, all shaggy and bushy and looking like Don King after he'd been dragged through a bush backwards!View attachment 791313 Damn man trim that bitch!

These days ladies undergrowth (if they actual have some) is all neatly manicured, as are the buds we smoke, funny how fashion works innit!

hightimes.jpg

hightimes2.jpg

hightimes3.jpg
No stick no stems
That u dont need
Acapulco gold is
Bad asss weeed......aaaahhhhhhhh

Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top