Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know. I do know that I like to know the lineage and that we all need to be holding on to some genetics to keep big money from absolutely ruining another natural species on this planet.

The argument I heard from Phylos was trying to protect breeders from people from a "round-up ready" scenario, where cannabis genetics are sprayed with round-up and now there's a lawsuit about "well, those are now OUR genetics."
 
Do you guys think autoflowers should be genetically registered? Like Phylos?
That’s tricky... are they officially classified as a new species or the work of years of mutations from the sativa hermie tendencies and environmental stimulates ...
we really don’t know do we
 
howdy peeps :pass:
todays mailbag
IMG_5044.JPG

:pighug:
 
could just say i made them..:crying:................i dont mind being accredited for the birth of auto's:crying:

Hi pal , well if you were to send and register a sample of let's say mesphist you've grown to phylos and Mitch hasn't then on there data base it's yours, unless I reading it wrong
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top