New Grower buds or leaves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dwhizzle74
  • Start date Start date
Yes, unless it is a strain with room for potency to improve, it probably won't change much. This is because around 20-23% appears to be the selection plateau - the peak potency that we are able to reach by physical constraints. You can only pack so many trichomes per square inch, and when saturated at that point you can only select for trichome head size from that point forward.

So, if we have a strain that isn't near the physical limits of max potency, that would be the one to test if uv has any effect. And, it appears that I do. I had a super cali haze that didn't auto outdoors, so I cloned it, and now a clone of it is going indoors. This super cali haze I had outdoor was the least potent of all my strains this fall. Very small sized trichomes lightly dusting the bud, and almost no resin on the leaves to speak of.
And, I shit you not, this sch indoors under the 500w blackstar is producing thick trichomes all the way down the bud leaves and on the stems of the fan leaves. Thicker resin on the bud as well.
Now, on well known (to me) strains that are already potent, the only difference I have noticed is how much further down the leaves the trichomes are forming. On my connie chung and super sour og, the resin travels down the bud leaves approx twice as far as outdoors. Like 1.5 inches from the bud on some leaves the trichomes are super thick.
From my population genetics class - genetic variance + environmental variance = phenotypic variance. Example, this clone is always green (genes), but once it reaches 65 degrees (environment) different genes are activated and it turns purple (phenotype).
The process of gene activation and regulation reads extracellular signals to decide which genes (proteins) need activated at what time. So possibly this extra UV light (not enough to be harmful, but enough to signal to the plant to cause gene activation) is causing a defense mechanism and therefore it creates extra resin on the leaves to more effectively diffuse the harmful rays.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk
 
Agreed :D It seems very likely that the trichome production morphology - (ie. the population density, placement and abundance of glandular hairs) and advancement (physical structure) of some plants would be directly effected as a result of UV-B exposure. Some geneotypes from Afghanistan for example, produce copious quantities of resin and this trait may be a direct result of intense UV-B exposure, but is most certainly indicative of both genetic and environmental precursors. I think supplementation for increasing UV-B intensity in the grow space is an idea worth exploring for many cultivators - When are you planning to implement a UV lamp into your room? The lamps are very dangerous to use so take caution and get plenty advice.. I'd be interested in your results especially if you're able to give a comparission to it's sister outdoors..

Trifid :peace:
 
Many organisms have evolved to tolerate the molecular morphologies caused by UV radiation. Possibly the most adaptive are terrestrial plants that rely on full sunlight for photosynthesis -protective mechanisms can be classified into two main classes: (1) those whereby UV damage is repaired or its effects negated or minimised, and (2) those whereby the amount of UV radiation actually reaching sensitive areas is reduced. While protective in nature, all of these mechanisms impose an energy cost on plants so adapted.

This is sort of the key for me. Cannabis is a full sunlight species.

If you assume that trichomes are to protect the plant from dangerous UV's, would it not be conceivable that some strains need uv's to produce certain cannabinoids?

If the trichome is the cannabinoid factory, the plants have obviously evolved to take advantage of the harmful UV's.

UV's might not effect the amount of trichomes but it might effect the chemicals inside the trichome head.
 
Agreed :D It seems very likely that the trichome production morphology - (ie. the population density, placement and abundance of glandular hairs) and advancement (physical structure) of some plants would be directly effected as a result of UV-B exposure. Some geneotypes from Afghanistan for example, produce copious quantities of resin and this trait may be a direct result of intense UV-B exposure, but is most certainly indicative of both genetic and environmental precursors. I think supplementation for increasing UV-B intensity in the grow space is an idea worth exploring for many cultivators - When are you planning to implement a UV lamp into your room? The lamps are very dangerous to use so take caution and get plenty advice.. I'd be interested in your results especially if you're able to give a comparission to it's sister outdoors..

Trifid :peace:

They're already under UV and about 2 weeks from harvest, so we'll see. There are some uv bulbs in the newest blackstar led.

Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk
 
Interestingly one can see an the result of low UV-B exposure in untrained short-compact phenos. Here's a photo of a short-compact plant undergoing late LST to reveal lower (or 'hidden') bud sites and increase airflow/light exposure. The bio-mass has been 'spread' in order to bring the lower bud sites into full maturity before flowering time ceases. Notably one can observe a clear distinction in maturity and trichome production between the lower bud sites and terminal sites..

29.jpg
 
what if you had a UV supplement bulb on a separate timer set to come on once every hour for 15 min?
 
That's by all means a strategy worth contemplating, perhaps Jorge Cervante's manual will help you there - he discusses techniques to effectively suppliment UV-B :D
 
For autos I would reccomend not doing anything harmful to the plant due to their short life span.

In photoperiod plants, I have seen a technique called defoliation, where they remove fan leaves throughout its life. And there have been results showing that it actually yeilds better. I'll try to find the post on another site I read about this technique. (I know its not an autoflower tech. but its still cool to read about.)


Here is the post

Defoliation
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top