- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
- Messages
- 1,834
- Reputation
- 3,264
- Reaction score
- 10,488
- Points
- 0
- Currently Smoking
- Panama
When temperatures allow it I raise my light as high as possible.
You may have heard me and some of the others mention the inverse square law as it applies to the fall off of light.
'Light radiates at the inverse square of distance'
Lets say your light is a foot away, and you get a DLI reading of 40. From the top of your canopy to the bottom is another foot.
The bottom is twice as far, and will only receive a quarter of that amount, 10 DLI
Now lets look at what happens if the light is raised to 3 ft, and turned up to again give 40 DLI.
The top of the canopy is 3 ft, and the bottom is 4ft away.
The bottom receives 22.5 DLI, more than double!
If the light is raised to 4ft above canopy the bottom DLI goes over 25, and from here the return is minimal.
The downsides to this are much higher temperatures inside the tent, and of course more electrical costs.
You also need a fairly powerful light.
You may have heard me and some of the others mention the inverse square law as it applies to the fall off of light.
'Light radiates at the inverse square of distance'
Lets say your light is a foot away, and you get a DLI reading of 40. From the top of your canopy to the bottom is another foot.
The bottom is twice as far, and will only receive a quarter of that amount, 10 DLI
Now lets look at what happens if the light is raised to 3 ft, and turned up to again give 40 DLI.
The top of the canopy is 3 ft, and the bottom is 4ft away.
The bottom receives 22.5 DLI, more than double!
If the light is raised to 4ft above canopy the bottom DLI goes over 25, and from here the return is minimal.
The downsides to this are much higher temperatures inside the tent, and of course more electrical costs.
You also need a fairly powerful light.