Scarhole Auto Project

the wire training looks nifty , keep in mind though that you could be introducing more minerals this way , learned long ago that a rusty nail in a rain barrel changed the water drastically lol , i doubt your going to overdose them , just something to keep in mind and maybe watch for

peace :cool:
 
Bob the length of time his hanger is in there, it wont rust up enough to give off noteable traces. Cleaning in between uses will prevent that.

Biggest thing I would worry of is oils off the hanger contaminating the soil.

You made a great point on a nail and a barrel. Fastest way to introduce iron, rust.
 
Bob the length of time his hanger is in there, it wont rust up enough to give off noteable traces. Cleaning in between uses will prevent that.

Biggest thing I would worry of is oils off the hanger contaminating the soil.

You made a great point on a nail and a barrel. Fastest way to introduce iron, rust.

yeah , like mentioned , i doubt he will overdose em , just wanted him to be aware , and yeah , damn rusty nails

peace :cool:
 
his method, and time consumed is awesome. Not a lot needed to make plant fold, and produce more.


Funny thing, my neighbor cages tomatoes to keep rodents at bay.

I cage or pin them to provide a cheaper way, to produce more.


Where I plan to grow meds, I can't use this, reason for test.

bob you rawk we cool, friendship#1, harvest #2. come inhale fumes anytime. :bong:
 
Last edited:
Yippie
My induction ballest arrived ok.
Pics tonight....
 
Internet to the PC was fuckn up.

But now its pic day..

Cab pic
View attachment 179033


Pic of the AutoHaze from dinafem LST.
The 2 bottom braches have been getting STS 2 times a day for a week now.
View attachment 179032
Pic of the C5xBannana platinum.
One of them is a male?
Dam, I believe my outdoor Guerilla grown seeds were contaminated by foreign non-Fm pollen.
View attachment 179040

BALLS!
View attachment 179034


C99xAmnesia haze Auto.
Shes been in 12/12 for a week.
View attachment 179039


Swingkid (Chemd/bubba) X NLBB auto.
View attachment 179037


PineApple express LST shot
View attachment 179036

NH21/MM Pollenated with Amnesia haze auto that hates me.
Nearly pure sativas are hard in a small space...
View attachment 179038

Very Little cover in most spots.
But this wheat field may be perfect camoflauge to put outdoors autos in later.
View attachment 179035
 
NICE I am late due to replacement phone, so sorry for fucking with ya.

Great porn, Pictures look great though.

Sorry on the 1 male.
 
Sup man
it wasn't just one male.
I had a c5xthe white become a male and a c5xbannana platinum.

I hit them with my fem pollen nl5xhzC outdoors.
There should have been no males.
Since I don't know who the father is,those seeds are useless for me.

Oh well.
The majority of my seed came from indoor pollination and should offer no surprises.
I have pleanty of seed.

And the c5xbp lady left has some very wid leafs.
So I will Finnish her out......

:jaw:
But after a week the Nh21xMM clone plants are re flowering?
I think its due to the new light?
I pollenated the fuck out of them a they quit making flowers an just finnished their seeds.
But this week under the 400w Inductuon light there is flowers apearing all over!
And those 2 NHxMM dont hate me anymore.


View attachment 179356
 
Last edited:
Some info from a ninja or light measurement...

We're on a complex topic, lighting and it's measurement, that does not warrant one or two sentence responses. But I'm going to try and keep it as simple as possible for anyone who is new to this.

Any band pass type light meter is simply reading a net photon energy level.

A quantum meter is typically calibrated for sunlight and is not corrected for human vision sensitivity. It measures whatever net light energy is sensed and converts it to the calibrated numerical value between 400-700nm. It has no idea where it is landing in that range. I can actually take a PAR reading of a monochromatic green emission at a peak of 555nm and still read a high PAR value. A quantum meter does not utilize an algorithm that would avoid this region (if this is what Kite meant I take exception and if not forgive me as this is what I interpreted your statement to mean) and weight the PAR measurement more towards the red or blue bandwidths. A quantum meter will measure the blue spectrum's in higher PAR energy values than red spectrum's as the blue regions pack 1.5x the energy as the red regions. This relationship is defined in Planck's Constant as a quantum of action in quantum mechanics whereby, for example, a 400nm photon has 1.5X the energy of a 600nm photon. The quantum or PAR meter will read this value as such. It's just measuring the photon energy at the sensor.

A photopic light meter is corrected for human vision sensitivity (photopically corrected) and gives measurements in lux or footcandle readings and will have been calibrated to a certain kelvin value. These values are based on the human vision luminosity function whereby the highest photopic value is 555nm and the scotopic value is 505nm. This chart represents the peak photopic and scotopic values and the various points on the curve where human visual perception decreases.



If anything a value that does not exist today for plant lighting should be created that represents a something in a Par/Lumen value whereby the PAR/Lumen (I made this term up) value would take into account the weight of energy at a given point on the plant sensitivity curve. But since this value doesn't exist (akin to lumens but more in line with a composite lumen:CRI value) all you can do is look to the spectral distribution charts to see relative intensities that the lamp emits to determine if you're catching the wavelengths you're looking for. If you're going through all this and still considering purchasing lights or lamps from a manufacturer that refuses to publish their spectral distribution graphs because they claim their spectrum's are proprietary than I have a really good deal on a bridge for you. What these manufacturers are essentially telling you is to buy our product based on just our claims and not the essential data you should expect that is as a minimum necessary to make an informed decision of your own.

At the end of the day you still have to determine what these values represent to you as the end user. For example the lumen is quantity and the CRI is quality. Which is more important as the balance between these two is ultimately up to you to decide. In plant lighting striking this balance between energy and spectrum is of even of greater importance since it will spell the difference somewhere between crop success or failure.

Even when presented properly it's easy to get confused as this is a complex topic. If you take nothing else from all of this just remember; A PAR measurement will be better than a photopic value since these values are expressly meant to apply to human visual regions. But just a PAR value, as measured in how many uMole are striking the sensor at a given time, should not be used to determine if the light being emitted from a given light source has adequate broad spectrum blue - red to successfully take a garden to harvest. Therefore I use my quantum meter to determine if there is enough energy hitting the plants where I want the light and I use a historical reference from my previous grows to determine if the light being emitted is of proper bandwidth. This enables me to repeat grows successfully from veg through flower with a minimum amount of stress to either me or my garden. Lights/Lamps that regularly accomplish this and are energy efficient, stable spectrum, low heat and long life are likely going to find a spot in my garden.
 
Back
Top