Status
Not open for further replies.
If you want to know about pesticides in your pot, you have to ask
By AMY RADIL MAY 22, 2016
Twitter Facebook Google+ Email

  • File photo: Marijuana plants growing at Seattle's first legal pot farm, Sea of Green.
    KUOW PHOTO/BOND HUBERMAN
The Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board is taking steps to address high levels of pesticides found in some legal marijuana samples. But the agency does not currently require testing for pesticides. Growers say for now, it’s up to consumers to seek that information.

Last week the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis board approved the state’s first threshold levels for certain pesticides. Marijuana with higher pesticide levels could face a product recall.

Danielle Rosellison and her husband are licensed marijuana growers and processers in Bellingham. They rely on small rooms and controlled environments to grow without pesticides, but she’s not sure customers appreciate that.

Rosellison: “When we talk to retailers they tell us it’s not an issue. And I’m dumbfounded.”

Rosellison says customers may not realize that marijuana is not governed by the rules restricting pesticides for food crops. And there’s no standard product testing. But she says details about pesticide use are public, customers just have to ask.

Rosellison: “Growers have to give retailers the list of pesticides used in their products, and then if the customer asks, they have to be able to get that information from the retailers.”

State regulators also eliminated the residency requirement for people to give cash or loans to marijuana businesses in Washington. It opens the doors to outside money, but not outside ownership. Rosellison serves on the board of the Cannabis Alliance and says industry members are completely split on that proposal.

Seattle attorney Robert McVay says his marijuana business clients are also divided – those doing well in the current system don’t want to fuel more competition. But others are eager for capital, and out-of-state financiers want to supply it.

McVay: “Lending is not exactly what they want to do, but they still see an opportunity there. Especially when there’s this idea or optimism from some of those out-of-state investors that someday that barrier to ownership will also fall.”

One final change by state regulators: Businesses must now pay their taxes electronically or by check “to reduce the safety risks associated with large amounts of cash.” McVay says banking access for marijuana businesses – once a rarity – has quietly improved, with accounts first from credit unions and now from many large banks.

:doc:
 
You've never ate Gator tail ?

Mmmmmm............. Good !
I tried croc on an austrailan restaurant.
Will never travel there. Too many toxic spiders, snakes and other animals in my no-go category. I prefere White Widow in a joint, not Black Widow in my shoes.
My favourite is the norwegian classic Whale beef with Green Peace.

Tonight I will cook a chiken and make a pai with leek, spring onion, fresh pies and creme fraise.
 
If you want to know about pesticides in your pot, you have to ask
By AMY RADIL MAY 22, 2016
Twitter Facebook Google+ Email

  • File photo: Marijuana plants growing at Seattle's first legal pot farm, Sea of Green.
    KUOW PHOTO/BOND HUBERMAN
The Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board is taking steps to address high levels of pesticides found in some legal marijuana samples. But the agency does not currently require testing for pesticides. Growers say for now, it’s up to consumers to seek that information.

Last week the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis board approved the state’s first threshold levels for certain pesticides. Marijuana with higher pesticide levels could face a product recall.

Danielle Rosellison and her husband are licensed marijuana growers and processers in Bellingham. They rely on small rooms and controlled environments to grow without pesticides, but she’s not sure customers appreciate that.

Rosellison: “When we talk to retailers they tell us it’s not an issue. And I’m dumbfounded.”

Rosellison says customers may not realize that marijuana is not governed by the rules restricting pesticides for food crops. And there’s no standard product testing. But she says details about pesticide use are public, customers just have to ask.

Rosellison: “Growers have to give retailers the list of pesticides used in their products, and then if the customer asks, they have to be able to get that information from the retailers.”

State regulators also eliminated the residency requirement for people to give cash or loans to marijuana businesses in Washington. It opens the doors to outside money, but not outside ownership. Rosellison serves on the board of the Cannabis Alliance and says industry members are completely split on that proposal.

Seattle attorney Robert McVay says his marijuana business clients are also divided – those doing well in the current system don’t want to fuel more competition. But others are eager for capital, and out-of-state financiers want to supply it.

McVay: “Lending is not exactly what they want to do, but they still see an opportunity there. Especially when there’s this idea or optimism from some of those out-of-state investors that someday that barrier to ownership will also fall.”

One final change by state regulators: Businesses must now pay their taxes electronically or by check “to reduce the safety risks associated with large amounts of cash.” McVay says banking access for marijuana businesses – once a rarity – has quietly improved, with accounts first from credit unions and now from many large banks.

:doc:

Denver took a pretty active approach on this, though I'm not sure if the rest of CO has followed yet (I think I read they did). They have tested products from lots of growers, concentrate manufactures, edibles, everything and have even forced companies to institute a number of recalls on products when they found banned pesticides. I guess some think it's a burden on the growers and manufacturers having to recall products and do all that testing. As a consumer, though, I appreciate that this is the kind of oversight into bad practices that legalization is SUPPOSED to bring about. Then it's just up to the growers and the regulators to haggle over where to draw which lines on what chems can be used in the grows.
 
If you want to know about pesticides in your pot, you have to ask
By AMY RADIL MAY 22, 2016
Twitter Facebook Google+ Email

  • File photo: Marijuana plants growing at Seattle's first legal pot farm, Sea of Green.
    KUOW PHOTO/BOND HUBERMAN
The Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board is taking steps to address high levels of pesticides found in some legal marijuana samples. But the agency does not currently require testing for pesticides. Growers say for now, it’s up to consumers to seek that information.

Last week the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis board approved the state’s first threshold levels for certain pesticides. Marijuana with higher pesticide levels could face a product recall.

Danielle Rosellison and her husband are licensed marijuana growers and processers in Bellingham. They rely on small rooms and controlled environments to grow without pesticides, but she’s not sure customers appreciate that.

Rosellison: “When we talk to retailers they tell us it’s not an issue. And I’m dumbfounded.”

Rosellison says customers may not realize that marijuana is not governed by the rules restricting pesticides for food crops. And there’s no standard product testing. But she says details about pesticide use are public, customers just have to ask.

Rosellison: “Growers have to give retailers the list of pesticides used in their products, and then if the customer asks, they have to be able to get that information from the retailers.”

State regulators also eliminated the residency requirement for people to give cash or loans to marijuana businesses in Washington. It opens the doors to outside money, but not outside ownership. Rosellison serves on the board of the Cannabis Alliance and says industry members are completely split on that proposal.

Seattle attorney Robert McVay says his marijuana business clients are also divided – those doing well in the current system don’t want to fuel more competition. But others are eager for capital, and out-of-state financiers want to supply it.

McVay: “Lending is not exactly what they want to do, but they still see an opportunity there. Especially when there’s this idea or optimism from some of those out-of-state investors that someday that barrier to ownership will also fall.”

One final change by state regulators: Businesses must now pay their taxes electronically or by check “to reduce the safety risks associated with large amounts of cash.” McVay says banking access for marijuana businesses – once a rarity – has quietly improved, with accounts first from credit unions and now from many large banks.

:doc:

This is really good to know, for the next time we visit down in WA.
 
Lasagne ready for the oven..still havent decided what to make for later...
20160611_170604.jpg
 
I`m havin` steak and chips and Pomerol(when the Welsh game finishes and b4 the ENGLAND game kicks off!)...I is multi-cultural I is!:smoker:... Jus swees Charlseston et all...:yeah:...:pass:
 
Sound nice.
I'll copy that. I planned to bake a cake for my tea, but will later. Maybe. Carrot cake and banana cake.
Thank you, @Mossy.
I'll bake you a cake. Which one? Or both? I prefer the carrot cake with raisins, mostly made of dark sugar, butter and eggs. 5000 kcal pr. serving. When I bake one and get munchies...it's gone in the morning. But I can use a few extra kilos in case of famine.
I am a good cook also, you see. And a feeder.
Making a pai. Will show you when it is done.

We should have an AFN Dinner Party.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top