Always learning here on AFN!
hey Paul! ...overall she looks fine, just treat her like the long cycle auto she is... shift your nute emphasis toward more K than P in the last stage on bloom; S(sulfate, commonly compounded with nutes), and certain micro's play big parts in terpene production so don't "starve" her to try and force more rapid finishing, that really isn't how it works...
Do mind the N input though, too much of that can negatively affect the bud quality.
The common misperception is that auto'ing and speed are tightly linked...they aren't. "Auto'ing" simply means they will bloom under any light hour regime, long or short, and that's it! The life cycle speed is another thing more tied to the parentage and breeding/selections during their making.
Many commercial auto growers want long veg' times and life cycles to boost production... Many home growers want the opposite!
Some pheno's in cultivars that are more mainstream in life cycle times may still have the occasional lagger...
Shoddy hasty breeding is notorious for this as well. I recall dozens of instances when I ran Sick Bay here of auto's from several breeders (new ones especially) putting out early F generation works that were inconsistent to say the least; some were still actually photoperiod sensitive and had to be treated as such to finish them...
IMO, auto's that need more than 10 weeks or so to finish have lost their advantage over normal photo' types. At say 12 weeks, one might as well have grown the photo version and saved $$ on power costs...
** off to work, more later