Dutch Passion 3xAutoDaiquiri Lime under 5x citizens1212

[Bliciu86]

 

[Bliciu86]

Day 74
Few more days for that one

5 more of daiquiri limes
Day 39

 

[Sensi Jay]

Bit of k def poss, but only cos so close to lights hence tacoing as RB says.

Stick to same level nutes IMO.

 

[Simplicio]

65 day
Ec 1.8 can c a bit of nutrients burned bt I'm let them to deal with it
Ph 6.0
Temp bottom 23-21
Top 26-27

View attachment 845872 View attachment 845873 View attachment 845874 View attachment 845875 View attachment 845876 View attachment 845877 View attachment 845883 View attachment 845886 View attachment 845892 View attachment 845893 View attachment 845894 View attachment 845895 View attachment 845896

I recently switched from a GH Ecogrower top feed Deep Water Culture system to a Current Culture Under Current Solo Pro without the top feed.
I had been getting severe nute burn gold spots on leaves in late flower, even when using EC=0.7, or ppm=350 on the 500 scale.

There is an astounding difference between nute recommendations between these two companies.
Not only does Current Culture (https://cch2o.com/cultured-solutions-feeding-schedule/) recommend a MUCH lower ppm than GH (http://gh.growgh.com/docs/Feedcharts/GH_FloraSeries-REC_03216am.pdf), but they also recommend far less phosphorous than GH.

Here are the PPMs recommended by each for 8 weeks of flower, GH average values listed first:
1100-210, 1125-250, 1150-300, 1200-325, 1200-350, 1225-300, 1150-225, 950-200
The GH ppm recommendations are about 4 times as great as the Current Culture recommendations.
The same pattern also holds for veg, where GH recommends 5 times the ppm as CC, which averages about 110.
My last grow using ecogrower had some huge plants, including an almost 6 ft mephisto sour bubbly, while never exceeding 350 ppm.

My tentative opinion is that GH and most other nute makers recommend too much nutes to sell more nutes, and that CC's 350 ppm max during flower, and max 160 during veg, is correct for their DWC.
It's likely that DWC is so powerful, that the nutes are more efficiently used than expected.
But I won't know til I try the CC recommendations for a complete grow.

 

[Bliciu86]

I recently switched from a GH Ecogrower top feed Deep Water Culture system to a Current Culture Under Current Solo Pro without the top feed.
I had been getting severe nute burn gold spots on leaves in late flower, even when using EC=0.7, or ppm=350 on the 500 scale.

There is an astounding difference between nute recommendations between these two companies.
Not only does Current Culture (https://cch2o.com/cultured-solutions-feeding-schedule/) recommend a MUCH lower ppm than GH (http://gh.growgh.com/docs/Feedcharts/GH_FloraSeries-REC_03216am.pdf), but they also recommend far less phosphorous than GH.

Here are the PPMs recommended by each for 8 weeks of flower, GH average values listed first:
1100-210, 1125-250, 1150-300, 1200-325, 1200-350, 1225-300, 1150-225, 950-200
The GH ppm recommendations are about 4 times as great as the Current Culture recommendations.
The same pattern also holds for veg, where GH recommends 5 times the ppm as CC, which averages about 110.
My last grow using ecogrower had some huge plants, including an almost 6 ft mephisto sour bubbly, while never exceeding 350 ppm.

My tentative opinion is that GH and most other nute makers recommend too much nutes to sell more nutes, and that CC's 350 ppm max during flower, and max 160 during veg, is correct for their DWC.
It's likely that DWC is so powerful, that the nutes are more efficiently used than expected.
But I won't know til I try the CC recommendations for a complete grow.

Ya man that's a solid article
Really appreciate it dude

 

[Bliciu86]

Day 80
Ph 6.0
Temp 24°
Humidity 45%

 

[Bliciu86]

Day 96
I've chopped the tops left rest for another week

 

[Bliciu86]

Some more trim

still to trim bt leave it till weekend

 

[Journey Man]

Looks like it will be a good harvest Bliciu!

 

[MassMom]

Nice journal, thank you