NEWS Reschedule Cannabis? Is it really happening?!?

wwwillie

AFN Vibe Guardian
Staff member
AFN Admin
AFN Global Moderator
Joined
Nov 6, 2013
Messages
11,234
Reputation
9,440
Reaction score
37,538
Points
0
Currently Smoking
anything I can get my hands on!
From The Daily Kos, a political blog I follow:
In a memo to lawmakers this week, the DEA [Drug Enforcement Administration] announced plans to decide “in the first half of 2016” whether or not it will reschedule marijuana, according to The Washington Post. Cannabis is now listed under the Controlled Substances Act as a Schedule 1 drug, a categorization it shares with other drugs, such as heroin and LSD, which the U.S. government defines as “the most dangerous drugs” that have “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.”

This is potentially the biggest news I have heard about our little wonder plant!! I'll see what I can find and get it posted here. I am soooo excited!! This is a genuine game changer!
 
I'm not optimistic. The DEA has been extremely dogmatic about this and I've seen no reason to believe they're actually going to reschedule. They should have rescheduled in 2006 but they pretended to consider it and summarily dismissed it unchanged.
 
Granted, we can hope. This time there is considerable money involved, hopefully that may tip the scales.

Bad news is that DEA officials think rescheduling it is a joke.

//Opponents of marijuana legalization, including top DEA officials, have argued that there's no hard evidence that proves marijuana has legitimate medical benefits. Chuck Rosenberg, the acting head of the DEA, went so far as to call the idea of medical marijuana a "joke" last November.

"What really bothers me is the notion that marijuana is also medicinal — because it's not," Rosenberg said in a briefing to reporters. "We can have an intellectually honest debate about whether we should legalize something that is bad and dangerous, but don't call it medicine — that is a joke."//
 
I don't know that I'd get too excited on all this yet, though. It's nice to see the DEA possibly talking about it, but at the same time this could be twisted around to be bad for the current momentum. Here's an excerpt from a similar article in the Denver Post quoting Allen St. Pierre who is an executive with the legalization advocacy group NORML:

Because it is so difficult for researchers to study Schedule I substances, moving marijuana into Schedule II — where it would reside along drugs such as cocaine — would open up research opportunities. That, in turn, could lead to the development of cannabis-based prescription drugs, St. Pierre said.

Dropping marijuana even further down into Schedule III — home to drugs such as ketamine — potentially would help marijuana businesses by allowing them to take a tax deduction that sellers trafficking in higher-schedule substances cannot claim, said Taylor West of the National Cannabis Industry Association.

Combine that with just a smattering of conspiracy theory, and I could see them moving to Schedule II, which would then open up more research by "big pharma", leading to them claiming they have the medicinal properties now in pill form so the current medical use in the states that have is no longer needed. Then cut the DEA loose...

Bit of a stretch, but with the revelations coming out recently from Nixon's advisor, I'd almost say anything is possible. :pass:
 
Last edited:
You mean this little tidbit:
The aide, John Ehrlichman, detailed how Nixon's anti-drug crusade was really used to target the president's two big enemies in the 1968 campaign, according to the New York Daily News.

"We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities," Ehrlichman said, according to the News. "We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."

Ehrlichman was Nixon's domestic policy chief. He gave the interview for a book on the drug wars by author Dan Baum, the News said.

Baum said he didn't include the comments in his book because they didn't fit, according to the Daily News. The quotes resurfaced Tuesday after Baum wrote about them for a cover story in the April issue of Harper's.

Nixon labeled drug abuse as "Public Enemy No. 1" in 1971 and launched a major effort against it with tough new laws and the formation of the Drug Enforcement Agency.

Two years later, about 300,000 people were being arrested annually under the new laws. The majority of them were African-American, according to the News.

Every president since Nixon has continued the drug war in ways.

Ehrlichman died in 1999. He served 18 months in prison for his role in the Watergate scandal.

Nixon resigned before he could be impeached and was later pardoned by his successor, President Gerald Ford.

The Ehrlichman interview actually first surfaced in 2012, but received little attention at the time, according to the News.

The Rev. Al Sharpton told the News that Ehrlichman's comments were confirmation of what many black people have feared for years.

"That this was a real attempt by government to demonize and criminalize a race of people," he said. "And when we would raise the questions over that targeting, we were accused of all kind of things, from harboring criminality to being un-American and trying to politicize a legitimate concern."

Insiders have speculated that Ehrlichman made the revelations because was angry over not being pardoned himself, according to the News.
Cut and pasted from Syracuse.com
 
I don't know that I'd get too excited on all this yet, though. It's nice to see the DEA possibly talking about it, but at the same time this could be twisted around to be bad for the current momentum. Here's an excerpt from a similar article in the Denver Post quoting Allen St. Pierre who is an executive with the legalization advocacy group NORML:



Combine that with just a smattering of conspiracy theory, and I could see them moving to Schedule II, which would then open up more research by "big pharma", leading to them claiming they have the medicinal properties now in pill form so the current medical use in the states that have is no longer needed. Then cut the DEA loose...

Bit of a stretch, but with the revelations coming out recently from Nixon's advisor, I'd almost say anything is possible. :pass:


I can see that. As soon as big banks and pharmaceutical companies can position themselves I'd say it will change, for the worst.
 
Back
Top