first time autoflower grower is this nute burn

Joined
Jul 14, 2022
Messages
59
Reputation
10
Reaction score
126
Points
0
skunk number one

canna coco pro plus
3gal fabric pots
canna a and b canna rhizotonic canna boost
week6 pre flower
hard water 400ppm

i was feeding 1200ppm went to 1400ppm started getting tip burn. should i lower nute strength some one told me to feed 900ppm for now i thought that might be a little low. first pic is worse the one in dark is hardly affected they look a little droopy as lights just came on
WP_20220714_11_51_37_Pro - Copy.jpg
WP_20220714_11_40_25_Pro - Copy.jpg
 
Last edited:
Need better pictures, can’t adequately see leaf color and condition in either picture.
 
Need better pictures, can’t adequately see leaf color and condition in either picture.
sorry cant get better pics at minute the leaves look fine apart from very tips little pale could u tell me the correct ppm at week 6 thanks
 
@orange wing :welcome:Welcome to AFN:welcome:. Diagnostic pictures nee to be taken in Daylight 5000K for accurate color rendering. Just use a Daylight CFL bulb. Let it warm up before taking the pictures.

Your going to get lock-outs from too much calcium with starting water at 400 PPM. Most nutrient lines recommend 100PPM or less for your starting water. Max PPM for autos is 750 PPM not counting your starting water. It will be impossible to keep the nutrient balance with your water.



Can you get a copy of your water report online? I would be interested in seeing the mineral content and the sanitation section.

Be sure to tag me with the water report.

:goodluck:
 
@orange wing :welcome:Welcome to AFN:welcome:. Diagnostic pictures nee to be taken in Daylight 5000K for accurate color rendering. Just use a Daylight CFL bulb. Let it warm up before taking the pictures.

Your going to get lock-outs from too much calcium with starting water at 400 PPM. Most nutrient lines recommend 100PPM or less for your starting water. Max PPM for autos is 750 PPM not counting your starting water. It will be impossible to keep the nutrient balance with your water.



Can you get a copy of your water report online? I would be interested in seeing the mineral content and the sanitation section.

Be sure to tag me with the water report.

:goodluck:
here u go bud

For most analysis, results are from samples taken at random in the water quality zone of your area. In some cases, results are from samples taken from water treatment supply points feeding the zone.
Water Quality Summary Report
AnalysisAnalysis UnitsNo of ResultsMinimum ResultAverage ResultMaximum ResultNo of results above PCV limitUK/EU Limit
1,2-Dichloroethaneµg/l9<0.24<0.24<0.2403
Aldrinµg/l8<0.003<0.003<0.00300.03
Aluminiumµg/l2<14<14<140200
Ammoniummg/l2<0.047<0.056<0.06400.5
Antimonyµg/l10.280.280.2805
Arsenicµg/l10.280.280.28010
Benzeneµg/l9<0.06<0.06<0.0601
Benzo-3,4-Pyreneµg/l2<0.001<0.001<0.00100.01
Boronmg/l9<0.011<0.0360.06801
Bromateµg/l1<0.53<0.53<0.53010
Cadmiumµg/l10.040.040.0405
Chloridemg/l910.8032.4351.700250
Chromiumµg/l1<0.4<0.4<0.4050
Clostridium perfringensNo. / 100ml200000
Coliform BacteriaNo. / 100ml600000
Colony Count After 72 Hours at 22ºCNo. / 100ml20110No abnormal change
Colourmg/l Pt/Co2<0.70<0.730.75020
ConductivityµS/cm at 20ºC250452354202500
Coppermg/l10.00560.00560.005602
Cyanideµg/l8<4<4<4050
Dieldrinµg/l8<0.008<0.008<0.00800.03
E. coliNo. / 100ml600000
EnterococciNo. / 100ml100000
Fluoridemg/l10.480.480.4801.5
Free Chlorinemg/l60.050.230.480No abnormal change
Heptachlorµg/l8<0.003<0.003<0.00300.03
Heptachlor epoxideµg/l80.0000.0000.00000.03
Ironµg/l2<8<990200
Leadµg/l1<0.1<0.1<0.1010
Manganeseµg/l2<0.7<0.70.7050
Mercuryµg/l6<0.034<0.034<0.03401
Nickelµg/l11.51.51.5020
Nitratemg/l115.5515.5515.55050
Nitritemg/l1<0.005<0.005<0.00500.5
Nitrite - Nitrate Calculated-10.310.310.310<1
OdourDilution Number20000Acceptable to Customer and no abnormal change
PAHµg/l20.000.000.0000.1
Pesticides Otherµg/l321<0.002<0.0090.01600.1
pHpH value27.257.297.330Min 6.5, Max 9.5
Seleniumµg/l10.190.190.19010
Sodiummg/l137.237.237.20200
Sulphatemg/l926721100250
TasteDilution Number20000Acceptable to Customer and no abnormal change
Tetrachloroethene and Trichloroetheneµg/l10.000.000.00010
Tetrachloromethaneµg/l1<0.20<0.20<0.2003
Total Organic Carbonmg/l9<0.8<1.82.90No abnormal change
Total Pesticidesµg/l80.0000.0080.02800.5
Total Trihalomethanesµg/l152.6352.6352.630100
TurbidityNTU2<0.12<0.12<0.1204
 
we had a letter not long ago saying they are updating water making it better i no that the ph went up almost 1.0 i done some photoperiod plants about 3 months ago they was perfectley fine its hard for me to get pics as im on ground floor flat to many theives in area
 
Your water report says ~250 PPM EC In Hanna. What scale are you running? That is still too high but in Coco You can run a little higher than in soil.

2022-07-14_13-09-10.jpg
that is .504 in millisiemens

ScreenHunter_260 Jun. 11 20.24.jpg


Your water report does not list the calcium so we have to guess at ~40% of the EC or 100 PPM Calcium.

If you have access to RO water from the store machines, I would blend in a gallon to 2 gallons of your tap water. Then use the Canna Coco Calculator for your nutrient schedule.

2022-07-14_13-23-19.jpg
 
im a id
Your water report says ~250 PPM EC In Hanna. What scale are you running? That is still too high but in Coco You can run a little higher than in soil.

View attachment 1486794 that is .504 in millisiemens

View attachment 1486795

Your water report does not list the calcium so we have to guess at ~40% of the EC or 100 PPM Calcium.

If you have access to RO water from the store machines, I would blend in a gallon to 2 gallons of your tap water. Then use the Canna Coco Calculator for your nutrient schedule.

View attachment 1486796
im a idiot my water is 0.4ec i feed 1.2 ec i use blue lab truncheon will get some ro water and follow chart thanks for the help very much appreciated i thought 0.4 ec was 400 ppm
 
im a id
im a idiot my water is 0.4ec i feed 1.2 ec i use blue lab truncheon will get some ro water and follow chart thanks for the help very much appreciated i thought 0.4 ec was 400 ppm
No need to be sorry or feel dumb. Why they have 5 Scales and Two Metric measure for the same object is beyond me.

I constantly verify this information by referring to the chart. It is so easy to read Micro Siemens in place of Milli Siemens or vice versa.
 
No need to be sorry or feel dumb. Why they have 5 Scales and Two Metric measure for the same object is beyond me.

I constantly verify this information by referring to the chart. It is so easy to read Micro Siemens in place of Milli Siemens or vice versa.
i can see why u thought what 2.4ec that would have been thanks for the help much appreciated
 
Back
Top